Which one would be good that i could connect to from a Windows box if any at all? I know i can connect from linux to Windows.
2007-11-20 07:09:23 · 6 answers · asked by Rob 2 in Computers & Internet ➔ Software
Are you building this yourself or looking for a commercial solution? For commercial NAS solutions I tend to favor NetApp (historically built on a customized Solaris OS...not sure of the more recent appliances). They integrate well with NIS, NIS+, LDAP, and AD for authentication and support CIFS and NFS protocols. If you are looking for SAN based storage, I've only used StorageTek with Veritas software (both companies have been bought out since my dealings with them).
For home use, any Linux or UNIX based server would work well for you. Just use SAMBA to handle the CIFS protocol and you should be set. SAMBA is often included with various Linux/UNIX releases but can be downloaded separately if needed.
Oh, if you need to do the reverse (Linux/UNIX connecting to a Windows File Server) check out the Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX (SFU). Generally works for basic file sharing but if you have any rapid file access usage, you might encounter the dreaded Microsoft Windows file locking problem.
2007-11-20 07:16:12 · answer #1 · answered by Jim Maryland 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in case you bypass the Linux course with an elementary shared record server, you will want Samba. Of the smaller Distros, puppy Linux has a small memory footprint and likewise has maximum if no longer each and all the classes you will want precompiled. Fedora 8 will artwork nicely regardless of the indisputable fact that 9 and 10 look buggy in some aspects. i've got no longer tried 11 yet. in any different case,you should apply Win98 or perhaps Win95 for an elementary record share gadget. The suggestion here may well be to create a 2d partition on the force so as that the working gadget must be thoroughly remoted from the shared portion of the force even regardless of the indisputable fact that the sharing gadget enables guy or woman directories and separate passwords for each share. in case you may desire to have extra shelter and constrained get entry to, lower back to Linux and the configuration gets exciting. whilst there are strategies which will help you configure Samba, i've got no longer got here upon any that easily do the interest. I continually finally end up manually changing the configuration. remember, there grew to become into an entire e book revealed basically on Samba and that's surprisingly massive. I easily have an FTP/Apache/Samba record server working off of Fedora 8 at artwork on the community community. in case you think of configuring Samba is agreeable, you're able to do Apache, Samba and FTP so as that all of them artwork on an identical record share course. frequently I easily have Apache serving up the information and FTP just to function information to the study basically area of the server. Samba nevertheless isn't working the way i like it to artwork. The extremely undesirable area is it grew to become into frequently a wasted attempt and the information are nevertheless served off of the Win98 gadget that i began out with around 10 years in the past. no person likes substitute. The Linux gadget is easily extra handy to apply besides the indisputable fact that it is risk-free extra advantageous and a splash extra tricky to function new information. Configuring computers or in fact doing something different than the bare minimum to maintain them working is "a waste of time." So i'm oftentimes fixing a disaster whilst issues supply up working. Shadow Wolf
2016-10-17 12:54:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I always use SUSE for servers. There is plenty of built in software to support file and remote access connections.
2007-11-20 07:27:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Red Hat is the most supported, so I suggest to get that one. I always go to Distrowatch for all of my Linux needs. Link below.
2007-11-20 07:19:54 · answer #4 · answered by Juice 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you'll be installing it and managing it yourself, I'd suggest FreeBSD hands down. NetBSD is also very secure and stable, but because you're asking the question, I'm gaging your level of experience with Unix to be minimal, and FreeBSD has (I believe) the largest number of applications ported to its platform, therefore, FreeBSD. Voila!
http://freebsd.org
They have a huge and handy handbook online for you to brush up with.
2007-11-20 07:17:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm, I'm not sure, I have been an Ubuntu user for about a year now and Love it, so maybe Ubuntu server would be a good choice?
2007-11-20 07:17:31 · answer #6 · answered by Bewildered one 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋