I have been wondering this for a long time. At first I thought it was because the person being quoted was leaving out the word(s) in parenthesis. If that was the case then the quote would never make any sense to begin with 95% of the time. In some instances the word that is in parenthesis could have been eliminated by the speaker, but not every time. Yet I don't understand why those words are being put in parenthesis. It makes absolutely no sense to me.
2007-11-20
03:57:25
·
3 answers
·
asked by
duped4thelasttime
3
in
Education & Reference
➔ Quotations
Here's an example that made me ask the question:
"There is no statutory requirement that mandates us to elect between the charges of (first-degree or second-degree murder). We will leave the ultimate decision to the fact finders when we go to trial in this complex case."
What is the point of putting first-degree or second-degree in parenthesis?
2007-11-20
03:59:30 ·
update #1
Yun I understand what you're saying, but look at the quote that I used. If they would've left out first-degree and second-degree... in the quote the the sentence would've went like this:
"There is no statutory requirement that mandates us to elect between the charges of. We will leave the ultimate decision to the fact finders when we go to trial in this complex case."
2007-11-20
04:06:50 ·
update #2