http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hHbhKzL-q6SbazRgpk6_Ino2YPZwD8ST5NG80
2007-11-20 03:10:22 · 18 answers · asked by I'/\/\AZILLA2 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Goog morning, common_sense!
2007-11-20 03:19:57 · update #1
Lol! *Good* morning...
2007-11-20 03:20:15 · update #2
Omg... "a fertilised egg is a person and deserves rights"? Next they'll be banning ejaculation and periods "eggs and sperm are people too!" Seriously, give me a break, a fertilised egg is a collection of cells that do absolutely NOTHING besides divide, they aren't going to be too upset if they don't get as far as feotus.
I'm not sure how exactly these new laws don't effectively ban forms of birth control. The morning after pill is definately out. And IVF is definately out. Several zygotes are disposed of after succesful implant and most die naturally after implantation.
2007-11-20 03:42:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, i don't care. If I had youngsters, i'd enable Christians i replaced into familiar with babysit for me. I recommend, each and all of the Christians i comprehend properly adequate to have faith them with any youngsters I ever have are people who are not going to attempt to transform them. If it replaced into in my own domicile, i'd purely enable human beings I knew properly seem after the little ones, and that's actual regardless of the guy's faith. At a playschool or some thing, it rather is in comparison to they are able to do something besides- i'd elect to not placed my youngsters into openly religious childcare if attainable because of the fact they might desire to learn approximately each physique, not purely what some human beings beleive.
2016-10-02 02:49:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would allow an Atheist to fertilize my egg. lol (my husband is an Atheist)
2007-11-20 03:13:17 · answer #3 · answered by Celestian Vega 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Your question doesn't really make sense, and has nothing to do with the subject. Never the less, I agree with the Proposition being considered, and Pray it passes !
BTW: I would NEVER allow an Atheist to get near my Children !
OM
2007-11-20 03:20:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Um..... I would rather watch it myself... but if I couldnt watch it and I trusted the atheist (meaning it was a close friend of mine) then yes.
2007-11-20 03:13:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
all athiest should not be categorized and yes I would if it were my friend who cared for me..may not have come to grace yet but yes I would. dont look as a group but as individuals
2007-11-20 03:14:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
does this mean you get to drive at age 15, since you get to include those first 9 months...
and do we then give eggs the right to vote?, no thats 18, so can they vote on their conception date at age 17 now?
2007-11-20 03:13:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
What does that have to do with the price of eggs?
Not all abortionists are atheists.
2007-11-20 03:18:01 · answer #8 · answered by CurlySue 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes, as long as he takes a shower every day!
2007-11-20 03:18:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If people cared that much about the environment, then we wouldn't have melting glaciers and rising seas.
Overpopulation is the worst.
2007-11-20 03:14:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋