I find that as I mature as a Christian the meanings and depths of understanding of scriptures evolve. A newly conceived Christian may interpret differently then a more experienced Christian does. That does not mean that either is wrong-just that they have different perceptions as is normal for all unique human beings. And persons "cheery picking" from the Scriptures to find fault with them is easier to detect by a mature Christian then a newly conceived Christian. These differences are exploited by those looking to discredit Christian in general. Finding favorite Bible quotes to "cherry pick" comes easier to mature experienced atheists too. How's that for atheist "penny candy"?
2007-11-20 01:12:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by PrivacyNowPlease! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Bible uses parables, which are subject to interpretation. Its not as bad as most athiests make it out to be... most of the Bible is actually rather clear, it is merely subject to whether you believe it to be literal or metaphorical.
The real problem is that people take phrases or sentences out of context, and as with anything, when you take away the context, the words can be manipulated to have other meanings.
This is how it works... we'll take your comments and edit them to read like the Bible...
1 Is it true that Bible interpretations are like penny candy? 2
In that there are many different kinds 3 and you can just pick your favorites?
So some fanatic comes along and says... In the First Book of Dany, Section 3, it says "and you can just pick your favorites". and then using that to rationalize something like White Supremacy... that God chose white people over others... or some insane nonsense like that.
You really don't need much to go on when you are insane.
2007-11-20 01:04:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It grew to become into written that "no longer one jot or tittle could be lost". those humorous words are each and every small marks in the Hebrew textual content fabric which could thoroughly substitute a be conscious. however the element is, that the written be conscious does not substitute. that isn't approximately interpretation, yet on the subject of the voice of the scripture. In financial disaster 11, par. 5D (pg 341), "suitable words" of the hot data That demands a Verdict (Josh McDowell), it says,"Inerrancy does not call for that the logia jesu (the sayings of Jesus) incorporate the ipsissima verba (the suitable words) of Jesus, basically the ipsissima vox (the suitable voice). there are various translations (no longer interpretations) of the Bible. we've many in the English language on my own, as properly the thousands of languages and dialects international. yet, God promised that the written be conscious could proceed to be intact. Now, there are interpretations of a few scriptures which bring about some dogmas and/or doctrines. generally, in the event that they do no longer line up with the different scriptures, it is by the fact they are taken out of context. From what i understand of the English language translations, one is not greater advantageous than the different. each and every has some themes in reading specific words, which some lose the thrust or impact at the same time as others omit out on an entire concept. yet, the voice remains intact. the only translations, or variations, I easily have got here across to be innacurate are any modern ones which water down specific words in the call of political correctness. I additionally don't think that the Catholic version is easily ultimate in including the different books as canon - there are canonical regulations which do no longer line up. One translation, that could desire to be considered an interpretation, is the Jehovah's Witness' New international Translation. They declare that that's from unique Greek, which no Greek student could trust. Their version has passages thoroughly replaced as a fashion to trust their doctrine. In so doing they outfitted contradictions with scripture which might in any different case help those they replaced. that's a topic rely with plenty clarification. i choose to propose finding up McDowell's e book.
2016-11-12 04:35:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
5 people can read the same book and interpret it differently.....hence book clubs.
So yes the Bible is interpreted differently because each person who reads it will come away with something different.
2007-11-20 00:56:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by daljack -a girl 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think your quote re: penny candy, is quite accurate.
Brief and to the point.
Congrads.
2007-11-20 00:58:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by we_are_legion99 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
the bible is subject to lies.so if it fits your believe then so be , as the word weep is meening water, as to garden.
2007-11-20 01:02:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by vintagemale1951 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I disagree, but then I believe in God.
2007-11-20 01:02:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by William D 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
yeah, means all things to all people.
2007-11-20 01:00:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by numbnuts222 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
<>
2007-11-20 01:01:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Hoosier Daddy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
spot on
2007-11-20 00:55:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Fred S - AM Cappo Di Tutti Capi 5
·
1⤊
1⤋