English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ok, my b-day is coming up soon and i gotta pick between PS3 or 360.
im leaning toward PS3 since it looks better and has less failure rate (1% compared to 360's 33%) sure it costs more, but is it worth it i nthe long shot?

2007-11-19 13:06:15 · 10 answers · asked by game_geek00234 2 in Consumer Electronics Games & Gear PlayStation

10 answers

This is my cut and paste answer. The reason for that is because a tech info is a tech info, you can't beat it (sources below).

PS3 will win the console war, no doubt. Xbox 360 and Wii are so weak from technological point of view, that in couple of years they won't be capable of dealing with serious graphics. GTA IV, for instance, isn't even announced for Wii - this toy won't be able to cope with the game's requirements. Xbox 360 is getting GTA IV, however, the game is going to be released on several DVDs - Xbox 360 owners will have to interrupt gaming process and switch discs (Rockstar complained about this issue). Only PS3 will have it on single BD-DVD.

Let's compare PS3 and XBOX 360:

A third of XBOX 360 (33%) are malfunctioning right from the start. PS3 return rate is only around 0.2%. Despite some people say, that new 360 has no breakdown issues - just visit Xbox section of Yahoo answers and see for yourself an amount of complaints.

PS3 has 8 (7+1) kernels in Cell processor, Xbox 360 -only 3.
PS3 uses advanced tech called Blu-Ray, one disc can store up to 54 gb (in the future - up to 200 gb), Xbox 360 - regular dual layer DVD-9 (8.5GB). It's possible to get HD-DVD (max. - 30GB) for 360, but it'll cost you around 180$, in this case Xbox is going to be MUCH more expensive, than PS3.
Calculations per sec - PS3 - 51-billion-dot-product-operati... per second
Xbox 360 - 33.6-billion-dot-product-opera... per second
PS3 has full media support - USBs, built-in 4 slots card reader (except 20GB and 40GB versions), ability to use printer and so on.
Xbox 360 has USBs and only 2 memory slots.
PS3 supports up to 7 Bluetooth Controllers
Xbox 360 - up to 4 Controllers
PS3 - wi-fi included (except 20 gb version)
Xbox 360 - wi-fi will cost you around 100 $

Graphics are stronger in PS3, due to RSX chip, that was developed by Nvidia exclusively for PS3. RSX runs on 550 Mhz. It's difficult to compare their graphics chips, because 360 has a video chip with totally different structure and operating memory is divided differently in both consoles. However, PS3 exclusives look better than 360's exclusives.

PS3 uses technology from AGEIA company. It does to physics of the game same thing GPU (videocard processor) does to graphics. This thing is on sale for PC(special card). The price is around 350$. There is no such thing in 360.

Xbox 360 is widely known for so-called "red ring of death" problem - it gets overheated easily. My PS3 was running for more than 15 hours non-stop with no problems. Sometimes Xbox 360 becomes so overheated, that thermopaste on CPU melts, drips on motherboard and successfully shortcircuits it. That's why in some countries people call Xbox 360 "Coffin 360".

Besides all of this, I've seen disassembled Xbox 360 - regular PC architecture - Billy Gates is an uninventive nerd (as usual).
When I saw disassembled PS3 - it was a surprise - smart architecture, good cooling (don't buy external PS3 coolers - they make everything worse - original system is good), etc.

In 2008 PS3 will get more than 300 games, including Metal Gear Solid 4, The Agent and other great exclusives. Here is the good link to the future PS3 releases. http://ps3.ign.com/index/release.html......

PS3 online is free, Xbox 360 - you have to pay.

There were reports, that 360 scratches discs. No reports on that in PS3.

The funniest thing, that right now there are no games for PS3, that show full potential of the console. Biggest games weigh only 25 GB (Xbox 360 will need more than 3 discs even for those).

On PS3 you can install other OS, such as Linux Yellow Dog, Ubuntu and others. Sony officially lets you do it. There is no such thing in 360.

PS3 HDD can be replaced easily with any 2.5" SATA 5400 RPM HDD (used in laptops). 250 GB will cost you around 170$. In 360 you have to buy exclusive HDD, where 20GB will cost you 100$.

Sony expects PS3 to stay on the market for, at least, 7-10 years. Also Sony reduces price now. There is a cheaper 40GB version of PS3.

Sony constantly upgrades PS3 software (free updates for OS) - you get new functions and improvements.

PS3 controller (sixaxis) has a motion control - you move controller - game responds. Wii has it, Xbox 360 - doesn't. PS3 is getting rumble controller (Dualshock 3) in 1st quarter 2008, Japan gets it in this November.

On PS3 you can help sick people by running Folding Home project. Wii and Xbox 360 didn't even think about it.

New 40GB is 399$ or 399 euro (depends on the region) - it has no backwards compatibility with PS2 games, has 2 USBs instead of 4, no built-in card reader, but it's the same PS3, strong, reliable, less noisy, different cooling system. The price is friendly.

I didn't mention Wii, because it's so weak, no point to talk about it. Leave it for kindergarten and casual games.

www.teamxbox.com
www.kotaku.com
www.qj.net
www.ign.com
www.wikipedia.org
www.newegg.com
www.ps3fanboy.com and many other sources.

2007-11-19 13:17:50 · answer #1 · answered by Bull Goose Loony 7 · 2 1

The PS3 plays full 1080p hi-definition wheras the Xbox just upscales the image. The internet gaming is free for the PS3 so over 5 years that's £200/$270 saved compared to Xbox live. If you like online play there's Warhawk and Unreal Tournament 3 is coming out. Also the Playstation Network has Little Big Planet and Home coming to it.

Blu-ray discs mean that more can be stored on PS3 games allowing them to be bigger. An Xbox DVD holds about 8GB but a single layer Blu-ray disc holds 25GB and a dual layer holds 50GB yet a 360 game costs the same as a PS3 game. Grand Theft Auto 4 may have to be put on multiple discs for the 360 because they're smaller and you might not like having to get up to change the disc. The PS3 is a very cheap Blu-ray player while you have to buy a £120/$200 add-on to play HD-DVD movies.

The PS3 has been out a year less than the 360 and it's graphics are already equalling or bettering those on the 360. As the developers become better at developing games for the PS3 the gap will only widen. As far as games go most of the better games for the Xbox are either multi-platform or going to come out for the PC at some point like Gears of War and Halo 1 & 2 already have.

Here's a list of what I think are or will be the best games for the PS3:

Well right now there's Resistance, Ninja Gaiden Sigma, Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Ratchet and Clank, Virtua Fighter 5, Resistance Fall of Man, Heavenly Sword, Stranglehold, Assassin's Creed, Virtua Tennis 3, Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2, Guitar Hero 3, Singstar and Call of Duty 4.

Uncharted, Killzone 2, Haze, MGS4, Final Fantasy XIII, Gran Turismo 5, Afrika, Little Big Planet, Tekken 6 and God of War 3 will be coming out as PS3 exclusives. Also the maker of Ico and Shadow of the Colossus is making his next game exclusively on PS3.

As well as this there are ones that are multi-platform like Devil May Cry 4, Kane and Lynch: Dead Men, Lost Planet, Resident Evil 5, Soul Calibur 4 and Rock Band. A new Jak and Daxter and Bioshock are rumoured to be coming out on the PS3.

The Xbox is cheaper (but I don't think it is in the long run) and Xbox live is probably better (but you have to pay). The original Xbox only had a lifespan of 4 years and with the 360's problems it may only last another 2-3. The PS2 had a lifespan of 6 years and the PS3 is planned to last 7-10 years. All PS3 controllers are rechargeable, you just connect them to the USB port to charge, but you have to buy a rechargeable battery pack if you don't want to use AA batteries for the 360 pad. The PS3 has much better hardware than the Xbox which has massive 30% failure rate.

The PS3 is the most value for money as all models have a hard drive, a HDMI port, and Wi-fi built in but for the 360 you have to pay more in some way or another for these features. Only the PS3's games are all region free so you can import games from other countries before they come out or get an obscure Japanese game if you want.

I think you should make your decision based on which console's games you prefer but I would go for the PS3.

2007-11-19 13:23:21 · answer #2 · answered by Neil G 5 · 1 1

Ummm.... everyone knows that the Wii is better than both the PS3 and Xbox360 combined.... The 360 released way too early and the PS3 copied the Wii's motion sensing but FAILED MISERABLY because they're like "ooohhhhh yea u can tilt the controller YAYYY" and the Wii is all about interactment.... so screw the PS3 ($600) and the Xbox360 ($400) and go get the best system of the three (it's also the cheapest - $250). The Wii pwns the other two systems by a long shot!

2016-05-24 06:32:16 · answer #3 · answered by eugenia 3 · 0 0

PS3 BABY!! lol, but really, for reliabilty, and games (ya i know, just listen), ps3 is the way to go.

first off, ps3 was intended to be am 8-10 year console, and by that time, microsoft wll have something new, so whats better?, one 500 dollar console, or 2 350 dollar consoles?

sony and exterior development companies currently have like, almost 300 games currently in development... with actually quite a few ps3 games out already, you just gotta look.

and i know TONS of people with 360s, in which 4 out of ten people have sent them in for multiple repairs. and thats new ones too, not just original release

x-box live really does beat sony in onlne, but what can you expect if you pay for it. if you really think about it, sony is almost on par with x-box live for the online features that you REALLY want. to play against other people. i could care less about chat and other online frills. did i say its FREE as well...?

and dont forget the console war. many many video stores recently dropped the hd-dvd format from there shelves... theres gotta be a reason for that.

well, yeah, thats just my opinion from experience, best of luck!

2007-11-19 13:21:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

the failure rate is not 33% anymore. That was only upon the release date, so don't buy your console because of that statistic. If you want to wait 2 years to get good games, then go for a PS3. But if you want good games now and in the future then get a 360. Much better online community also.

2007-11-19 13:13:55 · answer #5 · answered by Bandit! 6 · 0 4

they are both pretty much the same in most aspects but ps3 cost more and the 360 breaks easier

2007-11-19 13:15:39 · answer #6 · answered by Some Random 1 · 0 1

yeah go with the ps3 cause the other 67% ether just bought an xbox or are using a wet towel to fix it...

2007-11-19 13:14:17 · answer #7 · answered by brian 3 · 4 0

yes it is worth 10 years

2007-11-19 13:11:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It is worth it in the long run and the short run.

2007-11-19 13:11:16 · answer #9 · answered by Randy 5 · 2 0

get the 360 the ps3 breaks way to easily

2007-11-19 13:13:51 · answer #10 · answered by ~^v^dont kill the metal^v^~ 2 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers