English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why are they so stubborn? The Bible clearly states that we was created by God. It don't say nothing about us evolving from a bunch of dim-witted monkies!

2007-11-19 07:35:21 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

28 answers

Although when I meet people like you, I wonder...

Just kidding. I see God's fingerprint on you. And not in the creepy way either.

2007-11-19 07:38:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Liberals have their "scientific" evidence, but they find primitve ape fossils, primitive human fossils, but no fossils that link humans to apes. Yet they still go on that we evolved from apes.

On the other hand, there is plenty of scientific facts to disprove the evolutionary theory of human developement. Take evolution as simply stated that we all evolved from the primordial slime, to what we are today through various mutations and adaptations that have occured over the eons.

If over the course of millions of years that it takes for these mutations to develope and pass on from one generation to another, and of those mutations, only those that allow only the fittest to survive and flourish are the ones to remain, and scientist/evolutionists all agree on this point, then why can't they explain the human eye (or any eye for that matter).

If a single celled protozoa becomes a multicelled organism, fine. But what/which genetic mutation that produced the light recieving cells of the eye benefited the organism, if it could not "see" anything. What/which genetic mutation that allow the ability to distinguish color benefitted the organism that still could not see? What/which mutations that created the lens to focus benefited the organism if it could not see light, or color, or distinguish shape?

By thier own definition, the developement of the eye, the hand, the neuromuscular system, and most everything else about all living creatures would have had to be created all at the same time, as each mutation would have been useless to the organism and the mutation would have been lost as only the strongest and most useful mutations would have survived.

Therefore, that means that even liberals would have had to be created by God, even though they act like apes.

2007-11-19 07:58:05 · answer #2 · answered by gilfinn 6 · 0 0

Because they are monkeys. If they weren't they would question the following...

Why don't we see apes giving birth to humans?

Where are the fossils to the Neandethals if they had once existed?
This is a very important missing link in proving the theory of evolution.

Besides, from the following words of Darwin ...
"In the dim obscurity of the past we can see that the early progenitor of the Vertebrata MUST HAVE BEEN an aquatic animal..."

From only this one small statement the following can be derived...

1) With common-sense when one says "must have been" - it means one is guessing. So it is obvious, if someone basis belief on any guesswork it means they are allowing themselves to be fooled.

2) If evolutionists still believe in Darwin, then they must also question why the earth is populated with so many different species of life, including the aquatics that Darwin speaks of, all existing SIMULTANEOUSLY.

Darwin believed in survival of the fittest aka natural selection-to the extent that he expected that one type of specie will recharacterize into another type .

We have no proof of Darwins theory.

We do have proof of a man -related race that existed millions of years ago. A race that used tools (eoliths and paleoliths which are the earliest type of man made tools - prior to the late-Pliocene tools found in Africa).

As much as evolutionists try to deny eoliths are tools, they can't deny that pliocene tools are also man-made. They can also continue to cover up the truth for fear that the truth will tarnish their reputations and puncture their false beliefs.

There is allot more that people should know about their creation and should make sure they seek out the truth from bonafide sources.

2007-11-19 09:29:03 · answer #3 · answered by JazzyG 3 · 0 0

the place, interior the Bible, does it state how long Gods day is? on earth, the day is 24 hours. How long is it in Heaven? How long does it take for Heaven to make an entire rotation? sure, i've got faith in evolution and the Bible. "God made the wild animals of the earth of all types, and the livestock of all types, and each thing that creeps upon the floor of all types. And God observed that it exchange into good." That exchange into day 5. On day 6, God created guy. The Bible does no longer say he created guy from nothingness. it is totally achieveable he converted the closest ingredient, a monkey, over the direction of hundreds of thousands of years (or an afternoon in Heaven)

2016-11-12 03:00:17 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I was not aware that politics played so much a role in religion and grammar. Also, since you didn't know, we're apes, not monkeys. This is not a new thing to science. The classification of the animal kingdom has been around for a while, and we are card carrying members. I understand you were pulled from Jr. High, where these things are taught, so I will forgive you your ignorance.

2007-11-19 07:42:54 · answer #5 · answered by Wicked Warrior 6 · 2 0

The Bible also says:
its OK to sell your daughter into slavery to pay off a debt...
that if a woman is on her period, it's OK to evict her from the city until she is "clean" (her period is over)...
a woman must be stoned to death for adultery....
that you may enslave people from neighboring countries (so, according to the Bible, Americans can own Mexicans and Canadiens...but they can own Americans as well!)

So, based on your logic, these are all acceptable, too, since the bible is so true.

(So much for the new millenium of enlightenment.)

2007-11-19 07:45:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I wish people would read their question before submitting. I can hardly pay attention to the question because I am blinded by the horrible grammar... "we was created".

Anyway, the Bible was written by man. It is man's interpretation of events and stories passed down from ancestors.... Therefore, you have to take some of it with a grain of salt.

2007-11-19 07:45:16 · answer #7 · answered by mm 2 · 2 0

The Japanese Bible says we were created from the dung of some animal.
The Hindu Bible says we were created by Brahma.
The Muslim Bible says Allah made us.
Men wrote all those books including the Christians and Jewish bibles.

2007-11-19 07:40:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

The Bible also states that the world can be picked up and shaken out by it four corners...

I don't know about you, but the last time I looked, the earth was an oblate spheroid. No corners to grab...

2007-11-19 07:40:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Some people dont believe that the Bible is the difinative truth.

Frankly..

A VERY large majority think it is a very well fabricated story book

2007-11-19 07:39:52 · answer #10 · answered by Matthew David 4 · 3 0

Judging by your use of completely improper grammer, I would say yes, you most definately evolved from a dim-witted creature.

2007-11-19 07:39:54 · answer #11 · answered by Rachel-Pit Police-DSMG 6 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers