English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

I'm sorry....yet another idiotic statement not supported by quotes or references...


YAY YOU!

2007-11-19 07:25:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Why would you affiliate the advent of the authentic Messiah with the rebuilding of the temple? The temple of God is His human beings, because of the fact the Bible says. God additionally says that He would not want for a temple outfitted of the arms of adult adult males, for what temple would desire to living house the God of the universe? as nicely that, Jesus' dying, burial and resurrection marked the tip of the temple, and the Bible pronounces that it would not be rebuilt. And it hasn't. sure, there are people who want, and are making plans, to rebuild the temple, yet they at the instant are not people who keep on with the authentic Messiah. the authentic Messiah, the Lord Jesus Christ, IS the sacrifice for sin. there heavily isn't to any extent further animal sacrifices for sin or for the different reason interior the dominion of God. Animal sacrifices are used completely for the devil now.

2016-10-17 07:21:20 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

Does not fit the types and models seen in the Tonakh.

Example. Joseph, as a type of Christ, did not come to convert the Egyptian people to Judaism, but rather was despised and rejected by his own brothers in order to save both the Egyptians and the Hebrew race.
Upon seeing Joseph the first time, they did not recognize him. This blindness exists today even with this question. However, there will come a day when Joseph will reveal himself to his brethren, to show that he was not dead, but indeed, alive and able to save.

If Yeshua is not Messiah, the Jews do not have one. For one, they lost their scepter to rule when Rome took away their right to capitol punishment. This broke the prophesy of Isaac in Genesis 49. Look it up in Josephus, the Jewish leaders mourned in the streets in sackcloth regarding this.
Messiah is to be born in Bethlehem, which is now under Palestinian rule.
Messiah was to come in April 33AD according to the prophecy of Daniel. If Yeshua is not Messiah, then messiah is too late.
Messiah was suppose to be traced back to King David. No Jews living today can trace their lineage back to David. How would you know?

All Messianic prophecy points to two comings of Yeshua. One has already taken place, the second is coming soon.
http://www.schneblin.com/studies/pdfs/in_the_volume_of_the_book.pdf

2007-11-19 07:24:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

because if that was so then ur (physical) temple would have already been rebuilt and it wouldnt be under a mosque, and u would be having ur usual sacrifices there from sin, Jesus humbled himself for us and so everyone can have an opportunity to accept him and be saved, he is the sacrifice. And Jesus was actually suppose to be king, his lineage came from king David but since the Israelites were exiled then the Babylonians took the throne. Find the truth urself.by the way the new Jerusalem will be in heaven not here.

2007-11-19 07:34:07 · answer #4 · answered by imacircle 2 · 0 0

Very true, Christians seriously need to read the Tanakh (Old Testament) to know what the Messiah is all about. Jesus wasn't even close to the description of the Messiah.

2007-11-19 11:34:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

that is not what the messiah was prophesied to do.


Isaiah 53


11 After the suffering of his soul,
he will see the light of life and be satisfied ;
by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify many,
and he will bear their iniquities.

12 Therefore I will give him a portion among the great,
and he will divide the spoils with the strong,
because he poured out his life unto death,
and was numbered with the transgressors.
For he bore the sin of many,
and made intercession for the transgressors.

2007-11-19 07:25:51 · answer #6 · answered by Michael 3 · 1 0

the role of Messiah underwent a retcon

after Jesus died and those who proclamed him Messiah realized, uh oh, he *didn't* accomplish anything the Messiah was supposed to (rebuilding the temple, etc) ... well, his followers thought up a brand-new role for what "Messiah" meant. so they found one that couldn't be contradicted by material evidence, and called it "salvation"

then they pretended that their new role was the original one all along, but that's another story

2007-11-19 07:29:26 · answer #7 · answered by grandfather raven 7 · 0 1

And He did. Every Christian's religion and faith is based on Judaism. And through His Blood, we are saved.

And you and I are the Temple. Rebuilt.

If you are referring to Solomon's Temple, it will be rebuilt in the New Jerusalem when Jesus Christ returns.

cheers.

2007-11-19 07:26:07 · answer #8 · answered by Perplexed 5 · 2 0

For by Grace are ye saved through Faith , and that not of yourselves , it is the gift of God , not of works lest any man boast

2007-11-19 10:05:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You are correct.
The "Messiah" that did come, God's chosen people didn't buy it, so along came Paul and watered it down and took it to the gentiles.

2007-11-19 07:26:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

For the same reason that they don`t believe that Mohammad brought the self same message..!!

2007-11-19 07:29:25 · answer #11 · answered by Terry M 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers