English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Sorry about the language

who hear believes in climate change?

Who here beleives in climate change caused by co2?

Who hear beleives after thousands of years and thousands of climate changes, that this one is being caused by man made co2?

Mount st helens exploded with enough power equal to 500 hiroshimas, it p[roduced more co2 than man ever has in 150 years,
and even then scientists were worried about a big freeze

but now they say, yup it's c02, man made c02

Dr kei mori grew a cherry tomato plant using double the concentration of co2.
It grew to over 15ft, produced over 15,000 tomatoes, and grew cherry tomatoes the size of golf balls

if co2 is so much more abundant now, how come no plants appear to be benefitting from it whatsoever?

surely they would be one of the first things to change, with more yield as they have more food for photosynthesis?

2007-11-19 06:11:10 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment Global Warming

Vladivoka and when it does, they will blame it on climate change!

2007-11-19 06:18:34 · update #1

Banjo plants feed off co2, more co2 bigger plants and more fruit, this is evidence you can see check, or perform miniature experiments for yourself as Dr kei mori did,

as you can see there is no change in the size of plants, none whatsoever, this would be one of the first observable changes with a dramatic increase in co2

2007-11-19 06:50:12 · update #2

11 answers

If global warming was real, it wouldn't have to be believed. Things that are real just are. No one believes 2+2=4, or what the speed of light is.

Only things that aren't real need to be believed, like believing in Santa Clause.

CO2 has risen from 240ppm to 360ppm or just 0.008%. And not all of this increase is from man. This very, very small change is far too insigificant to have any impact on the climate.

2007-11-19 06:39:45 · answer #1 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 1 3

I do, because that's what all the scientific evidence indicates.

Your information about Mt. St. Helens is wrong. Volcanoes emit 1% the carbon dioxide that humans emit annually.

http://www.gaspig.com/volcano.htm

This includes eruptions such as Mt. St. Helens.

It's not a question of "if co2 is so much more abundant now". It's been directly measured. The first observable change with a dramatic increase in CO2 is a dramatic increase in CO2!

Atmospheric CO2 concentration is now at 387 ppm:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Mauna_Loa_Carbon_Dioxide.png

In the past 650,000 years it had never been above 280 ppm:

http://www.mongabay.com/images/external/2005/co2_var.jpg
http://news.mongabay.com/2005/1124-climate.html

Virtually all climate scientists also agree that human greenhouse gas emissions are the primary cause of the current warming.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Climate_Change_Attribution.png

2007-11-19 06:50:31 · answer #2 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 2 1

Again, you've just randomly tossed out a bunch of questions, so I'll just answer them in an ordered list.

1. I do.

2. I do.

3. I do.

4. Actually, the amount of carbon dioxide released by volcanic activity is much, much less that that produced by human activity. I can't find the numbers for Mt. Saint Helens alone, but according to the USGS, volcanoes emit about 200 millions tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year, while humans put about 30 =billion= tons of CO2 into the air annually. (My source is below)

5. Because, as I said in your last question, there are many, many factors limiting plant growth aside from CO2 levels.

2007-11-19 08:47:55 · answer #3 · answered by SomeGuy 6 · 1 0

I didn't think that global warming resembled a mans parts.

And no i don't believe in "climate change" i think its global warming. Just think about it. What did the IPCC report say? They now thing that global warming is irreversible and that they underestimated the problems it could cause if we don't do anything. And what about the first ever carbon cycle report released a few days ago? The report says that the CO2 levels are WAY out of wack then they ever thought they were going to be.

And the temperature and climate of earth, is changing too rapidly for "natural causes" to be at fault. Humans don't want to blame it on themselves so they blame nature. Nature has done some of it but not all of it.

2007-11-19 07:22:29 · answer #4 · answered by ♥ Pompey and The Red Devils! 5 · 0 0

Man-made global warming--caused largely by human's CO2 emissions--is proven science. It is not a matter of "opinion" but of knowledge versus ignorance. And only the ignorant--or those being paid by special interests to spread lies--still pretend they are "skeptics."

You've quoted some of the false information circulated by, among othrs, the oil companies--like the nonsense that "Mount St. SHelens released more CO2 than man has in 150 years." Sorry--but you are incredibly gullible--anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge ofscience knows that is completly false. The same is true of the rest fo the fake "facts" you quoted--they're jsut that:fake.

2007-11-19 06:39:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yup! I agree with you even to the terminology.
Were did you get the value about M't Helens.
Yes the plants are going to absorb more Co2.
The plankton in The sea also.
The actual Co2 values are some of the lowest for
Millions of years.
This planet is not Placid.
It is very volatile,
Some how people ignore that, like living
next to volcanoes.
Name another planet that has tectonic plates.
Yes global warming may be happening.
It done it before many times.
So live with it!

2007-11-19 06:33:22 · answer #6 · answered by TWOBOB 4 · 1 1

You are speaking as a scientist but I know you are not, you are just repeating what other pple told you without any proof of anything your are saying.
Watch statistics, as CO2 is increasing in a NEVER SEEN proportion in the atmosphere, temperature also increasing with a NEVER SEEN speed.
Open your eyes and stop being manipulated by what pleases your irresponsible way of living. Of course, America is the biggest polluter in the world, people who still blindly believe in it will ignore the the irreparable consequences that it is causing to our planet.
By the way, China is approaching the level of CO2 emissions of the US but isn't it to produce exportation to Europe and USA?!!!!!
I

2007-11-19 06:45:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Here, Here. It's nice to see there are still intelligent beings on this planet. Take a look at the following subtraction problem:

1,000,000 parts per million (ppm) of standard air
minus 350 ppm of CO2. That's the current outside level
equals 9,999,650 ppm of normal air.

You're going to sit there and tell me that's the cause of the heating. It's a scam to stop the American economic juggernaut. Our one country is 42% of the world's economy. One American company, Boeing, out produces all of Europe's airplane company, Airbus.

That's what it's all about. If you guys are so sure that CO2 is the problem, go tell China to stop. They're now producing more than the US.

2007-11-19 06:23:27 · answer #8 · answered by Curt 4 · 1 1

The only concern I have with it, is some fool like gore will get into a position of power to destroy our lives and nation over a lie.

2007-11-19 07:38:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh Man Yellowstone gonna pipsqueak Mt St Helen's

2007-11-19 06:15:55 · answer #10 · answered by vladoviking 5 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers