Absolutely. Thats one of probably thousands of questions that rattle the brain. It's pretty ridiculous if you sit and think about it. How much of it is actually word of mouth after floating for years?
2007-11-19 06:13:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rich K 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Okay, limited space here, but here is a story:
Several years ago a friend of mine was in a minor car accident. He walked away unhurt. He called his mom and told her what happened, then used a rental car the rest of the day.
When he got home, about 10 hours later, his grandmother called and asked him how badly his leg and arm were broken.
Stunned, he asked her what she meant. She said she had heard that he'd broken his right leg and arm and had a head injury and that she heard this from another family member.
Intrigued, he traced back the calls through the family. He found that the story had been passed on through 11 family members before getting back to him. Each family member embellished the story just a little bit more.
There are deeper details, but limited space here to explain, but you get the gist.
So, since the bible was not even written until 200 years after the supposed death of Jesus, how much embellishment do you think was infused over 1500 years?
2007-11-19 06:15:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Originally, the gospels weren't supposed to be written. Jesus was coming right back. But once the eyewitnesses started dying off, it was considered prudent to write an account based on the best memories available. Quotes and details may not have been precisely literal, but there were enough people around to judge whether the gospels got it right. Otherwise they would have been rejected.
2007-11-19 06:22:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by skepsis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I write everyday about something. I'm sure the disciples did the same by the prompting of the Holy Spirit. Someone collected these writings and I believe it was either John or Paul. Peter and Paul had problems, but were completely united in the ending books of the Bible.
2007-11-19 06:22:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jeancommunicates 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Who said it took 30-60 years? Another scholar? Yeah, real credible.
This we know. The Gospel is the life of Jesus. We know the written Gospels all agree that he existed, walked the earth, performed miracles and claimed he was God. They all agree that he died and arose.
Now that is remarkable. And if they were written far apart as you suggest, even more remarkable. I'd like to see that duplicated.
2007-11-19 06:26:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by JohnFromNC 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
God inspired men to write the scriptures from many different sources such as even from some traditions. He is supposed to have guided them around any errors. In other words, He probably did not just talk directly to them. They were following certain man-made guidelines allowing God to work through them through prayer for guidance.
2007-11-19 06:17:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by gismoII 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
that's no longer incorrect to me for my area. purely kinda of unusual. If my mom is around your age and relationship a 30 year previous guy, i could be questioning, despite if it relatively is love, lust, interest, infatuation, some style of existence disaster or funds. something is attainable. yet, as long as the two one in each and every of you're chuffed and doing no harm to others and the international, and you're smart adequate to spend and save a watch on your retirement properly, why no longer?! Love is often sturdy.
2016-09-29 12:53:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by lacie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
True guidance from the Holy Spirit was present during the actual writing of the scriptures and assembly of the Bible. Assembled by the Catholic Church. :)
2007-11-19 06:19:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
The holy spirit reminded the disciples what was said.
2007-11-19 06:12:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by King Arthur 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
It was written in the life time of eye-witnesses.
2007-11-19 06:16:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by dougfr007 3
·
0⤊
3⤋