God spoke to me last night, and he said he wanted me to amend the Bible. How do I go about doing this?

Question

Seriously.

Am I crazy? The prevailing attitude will be that I am nuts and belong in a mental institution. Why? How is it different today than it was back when the Bible was written?

Answer 1

you are nuts....but will probably make alot of money....people want anything but Gods true word

Answer 2

I do hope you tested the spirit that came to you 1 John 4:1. and aren't deceived 2 Corinthians 11:4. It's happened before.

Well, it seems that those that do so claim an angel appears to them. Next they either have direct revelation, or some golden plates to translate for God.

Then they say the Bible has become corrupt and all churches are wrong. Fortunately, God is restoring the truth through them they say. Some of them marry several women for some reason.

But we all know that God didn't ask you to curse yourself this way. The Bible is now complete and the last chapter is the end of the earth. Nothing else to add. So yes, I'm sorry to inform you that you are crazy. People will still follow you though - just ask them to pray about it and Satan will take care of the rest.

Answer 3

BURN IT! It is destructive and written for illiterate people 2000 years ago which is now forced upon the uneducated population. It is contradictory and filled with horrors that are beyond our mental conception. The only people that believe in that book should be sent into institutions. You are not 'nuts'

Answer 4

I think you should look at the source who told you to amend the Bible. Just because you feel that someone spoke to you doesn't mean that it was God. You should do some soul searching. I think you asked this question to reach out to others to help you in some way. You need prayer.

Answer 5

The bible text is perfectly fine the way it is. Unless you were a prophet you can't do anything about that. But you could publish a new kind of bible and add little exurbs (little messages on the side) but you can't change the actual bible text. Are you positive it was God?

Answer 6

Nah, you are not at all crazy. Listen to your God and go for it. Some dude named Mohammed did it about 1500 years ago with the Old and New Testaments and also declared himself a Prophet so that it would have credibility. You can do it too.

Answer 7

Really..I doubt that, reason why ?

Because of this scripture.

Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and [from] the things which are written in this book.

Answer 8

It was only by the authority of the Catholic Church, which collected the various books of Scripture in the fourth century, that we have a Christian Bible at all. And it is only because of the Church that the Bible survived and was taught for the many centuries before the printing press made it widely available.


John Wycliff had produced a translation of the Bible, that was corrupt and full of heresy. It was not an accurate rendering of sacred Scripture.

Both the Church and the secular authorities condemned it and did their best to prevent it from being used to teach false doctrine and morals. Because of the scandal it caused, the Synod of Oxford passed a law in 1408 that prevented any unauthorized translation of the Bible into English and also forbade the reading of such unauthorized translations.

Tyndale was an English priest of no great fame who desperately desired to make his own English translation of the Bible. The Church denied him for several reasons.

First, it saw no real need for a new English translation of the Scriptures at this time. In fact, booksellers were having a hard time selling the print editions of the Bible that they already had. Sumptuary laws had to be enacted to force people into buying them.

Second, we must remember that this was a time of great strife and confusion for the Church in Europe. The Reformation had turned the continent into a very volatile place. So far, England had managed to remain relatively unscathed, and the Church wanted to keep it that way. It was thought that adding a new English translation at this time would only add confusion and distraction where focus was needed.

Lastly, if the Church had decided to provide a new English translation of Scripture, Tyndale would not have been the man chosen to do it. He was known as only a mediocre scholar and had gained a reputation as a priest of unorthodox opinions and a violent temper. He was infamous for insulting the clergy, from the pope down to the friars and monks, and had a genuine contempt for Church authority. In fact, he was first tried for heresy in 1522, three years before his translation of the New Testament was printed. His own bishop in London would not support him in this cause.

Finding no support for his translation from his bishop, he left England and came to Worms, where he fell under the influence of Martin Luther. There in 1525 he produced a translation of the New Testament that was swarming with textual corruption. He willfully mistranslated entire passages of Sacred Scripture in order to condemn orthodox Catholic doctrine and support the new Lutheran ideas. The Bishop of London claimed that he could count over 2,000 errors in the volume (and this was just the New Testament).

And we must remember that this was not merely a translation of Scripture. His text included a prologue and notes that were so full of contempt for the Catholic Church and the clergy that no one could mistake his obvious agenda and prejudice. Did the Catholic Church condemn this version of the Bible? Of course it did.

The secular authorities condemned it as well. Anglicans are among the many today who laud Tyndale as the "father of the English Bible." But it was their own founder, King Henry VIII, who in 1531 declared that "the translation of the Scripture corrupted by William Tyndale should be utterly expelled, rejected, and put away out of the hands of the people."

So troublesome did Tyndale’s Bible prove to be that in 1543—after his break with Rome—Henry again decreed that "all manner of books of the Old and New Testament in English, being of the crafty, false, and untrue translation of Tyndale . . . shall be clearly and utterly abolished, extinguished, and forbidden to be kept or used in this realm."

Ultimately, it was the secular authorities that proved to be the end for Tyndale. He was arrested and tried (and sentenced to die) in the court of the Holy Roman Emperor in 1536. His translation of the Bible was heretical because it contained heretical ideas—not because the act of translation was heretical in and of itself. In fact, the Catholic Church would produce a translation of the Bible into English a few years later (The Douay-Reims version, whose New Testament was released in 1582 and whose Old Testament was released in 1609).

When discussing the history of Biblical translations, it is very common for people to toss around names like Tyndale and Wycliff. But the full story is seldom given. This present case of a gender-inclusive edition of the Bible is a wonderful opportunity for Fundamentalists to reflect and realize that the reason they don’t approve of this new translation is the same reason that the Catholic Church did not approve of Tyndale’s or Wycliff’s. These are corrupt translations, made with an agenda, and not accurate renderings of sacred Scripture.

And here at least Fundamentalists and Catholics are in ready agreement: Don’t mess with the Word of God.

Answer 9

HE told me to add a chapter about how cool lesbians are. Did HE say the same to you?

Answer 10

I hope he said, "hit the delete key until I tell you to stop."