I thought not, but don't be so sure....
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3473700673882960591&q=huckabee%2C+norris&total=11&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
I think I'm almost compelled to vote for him now. Can you resist the call?
2007-11-19 03:45:30 · 21 answers · asked by Skalite 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The issue I'm voting/volunteering on this time is the future of the Supreme Court. I don't think Mike Huckabee will put in justices that protect the Separation of Church and State.
And we are very close to the legal framework for an ugly brutal Theocracy to be put in place. It's a 5-4 balance right now. Stevens and Ginsberg will probably not be on the Court in 4 years. So if the High Court gets another robed disgrace, the legal framework for a theocracy will be in railroaded through real fast.
I'm pretty sure Huckabee and Romney will nominate justices with the agenda of ending Church State Separation if they get in.
And, BTW, we've just had 8 years of born-again idiocy and he has been our worst chief executive in History. Bible thumpers have had the Presidency, majorities in both houses, a cowardly and conservative biased mainstream media, and a majority on the Supreme Court. Results?
3000+ military deaths.
600,000+ civilian deaths in Iraq.
No financial responsibility (8 years ago we ere looking at a tax surplus, we are now in more debt than ever. CONSERVATIVE!?! Conservative my a s s!)
Unable to save US citizens (thanks to cronyism and cutbacks) during a disaster that devastated one of our cites.
Al Queda stronger than ever.
I could go on.
But with a record like this, 4 more years of conservative fundamentalist Christian rule is something this nation can not afford!
2007-11-19 09:27:30 · answer #1 · answered by annarkeymagic 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
None - they velocity around ovals doing top over one hundred miles an hour with inches between them & the countless automobiles. i admire racing yet how clever is that somewhat - presidents continuously seem clever before & dumb afterwards so i'm now no longer waiting to vote for somebody who lacks sturdy judgement (good right here too close venture). Plus it takes a diverse quantity of conceit to have the arrogance to race & it extremely is now no longer a sturdy presidential trait. they are marvelous of their careers yet president is pushing it. We bypass away with the only actor yet i'd % better corporation & political experience. subsequently i'm a Dale Jr fan - he has a corporation supervisor & concentrates on using. i'd vote for Joe Gibbs or Rick Hendricks - sturdy corporation adventure & performs top with others.
2016-10-17 06:45:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We've been down that road before. Do you remember the Salem Witch hunts. That was the direct result of Christian Fundamentalism. There was even a water board technique that was used to detect Witches. Maybe you think it's time for a repeat of ignorance in our history?
2007-11-19 03:52:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Haha, totally hilarious. I would never vote for him, but I definitely like him a little more now. I guess conservatives CAN have a sense of humor. I was wrong!
Edit: People, before you answer the question, watch the stinkin' video. Nearly all the answerers are missing the point of the question because they aren't reading the details.
2007-11-19 03:51:25 · answer #4 · answered by Molten Orange 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. A person like that would cross the line when it comes to politics and religion and I won't go for that. I don't even like it when they play the religion card to sway votes even if they aren't a fundamentalist.
2007-11-19 10:50:19 · answer #5 · answered by genaddt 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a libertarian first. I don't care what crazy things a candidate believes as long as it doesn't affect the job he does.
So Ron Paul's my guy, because he seems to be the only politician who recognizes the difference between what he can do as president and his own personal beliefs.
2007-11-19 03:55:02 · answer #6 · answered by Doc Occam 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Creepy. Just effing creepy. Can Chuck Norris become more of a joke? Maybe when we catch him in bed with Kirk Cameron, but until that time, wow.
2007-11-19 03:53:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm not an atheist and there is nothing that would cause me to vote for a fundamentalist christian.
2007-11-19 04:01:30 · answer #8 · answered by gone 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not but then not being an American and not living in America,I can't vote for the President anyway
2007-11-19 03:48:22 · answer #9 · answered by darwinsfriend AM 5 · 7⤊ 0⤋
I'd vote for him if Chuck was his running mate...
Otherwise, I will simply assume that Chuck was only being benevolent and allowed him to survive the encounter.
2007-11-19 03:49:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋