English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't want to hear there is no God ...ect...I'm talking to Christians......serious answers only!

2007-11-19 03:17:15 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

19 answers

Jesus used God's name "I AM," (Cf. Exodus 3:14) and applied it to Himself several times.

The problem is that English Bibles do not do a good job (except in one case, which is John 8:58) in translating this literally. Several passages (in the Greek) are clear. These include: Matthew 14:27, Mark 6:50, Mark 13:6, Luke 21:8, John 4:26, John 6:20, John 8:24, 28, and John 13:19. Many of the English Bibles translate "I AM" to "It is I," or "I am He."

Denying the deity of Christ is an old heresy that goes back to a man named Arius. His heresy was a prime reason for the Council of Nicea, which resolved (at least in Christian circles) this fundamental belief.

2007-11-19 03:23:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Was Jesus the Father? No! Because Jesus said: “And do not call anyone on earth ‘father,’ for you have one Father, and he is in heaven.” (Matthew 23:9)

The Bible says:

Numbers 23:19 “God is not a man…”

Hosea 11:9 “...For I am God, and not man...”

Jesus is called a man many times in the Bible:

John 8:40 “…a man who has told you the truth…”

Acts 2:22 “Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know.”

Acts 17:31 “He will judge the world in righteousness through a man whom He has appointed”

1. Tim. 2:5 “…the man Christ Jesus.”

God is not a man, but Jesus, may God praise him, was a man, therefore, Jesus was not God.

2. The Bible Says that God Is Not a Son of Man

Numbers 23:19 “God is not a man...nor a son of man…”

The Bible often calls Jesus “a son of man” or “the son of man.”

Matthew 12:40 “…so will the son of man be…”

Matthew 16:27 “For the son of man is going to come…”

Matthew 28 “…until they see the son of man coming in His kingdom.”

Mark 2:10 “But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority…”

John 5:27 “…because He is the son of man.”

In the Hebrew Scriptures, the “son of man” is also used many times speaking of people (Job 25:6; Psalm 80:17; 144:3; Ezekiel 2:1; 2:3; 2:6; 2:8; 3:1; 3:3; 3:4; 3:10; 3:17; 3:25).

Since God would not contradict Himself by first saying He is not the son of a man, then becoming a human being who was called “the son of man”, he would not have done so. Remember God is not the author of confusion. Also, human beings, including Jesus, are called “son of man” specifically to distinguish them from God, who is not a “son of man” according to the Bible.

3. The Bible Says that Jesus Denied He is God

Luke 18:19 Jesus spoke to a man who had called him “good,” asking him, “Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.”

Matthew 19:17 And he said to him, “Why are you asking me about what is good? There is only One who is good; but if you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.”

Jesus did not teach people that he was God. If Jesus had been telling people that he was God, he would have complimented the man. Instead, Jesus rebuked him, denying he was good, that is, Jesus denied he was God.

2007-11-19 03:34:34 · answer #2 · answered by ag a 1 · 1 0

Yes, he was in the flesh. And those who were trying to say differently were talked about by John on his first Epistle.

1 John 1
1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life;

and Paul too had explained to the Hebrews ( I think that Paul wrote Hebrews ) :

Hebrews 2
14 Since the children have flesh and blood, he too shared in their humanity so that by his death he might destroy him who holds the power of death—that is, the devil— 15 and free those who all their lives were held in slavery by their fear of death. 16 For surely it is not angels he helps, but Abraham's descendants. 17 For this reason he had to be made like his brothers in every way, in order that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in service to God, and that he might make atonement for[f]the sins of the people. 18 Because he himself suffered when he was tempted, he is able to help those who are being tempted.


And, yes, He did claim to be God. That was why the Jews were going to stone him for what he was saying! So many miss that. And they told him why they were going to stone Him:
30I and the Father are one."

31Again the Jews picked up stones to stone him, 32but Jesus said to them, "I have shown you many great miracles from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?"

33"We are not stoning you for any of these," replied the Jews, "but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God."
( John 10 )

Why can't English speaking people who don't believe in Jesus as the Life see this, and yet still keep on asking questions about it? I think that it is something Jesus encountered way back in his day, because it was the truth, they could not believe it, and in our day, they don't even remember that they had heard or read it!

He said to them:
"You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!" ( John 8:44 - 45 )

2007-11-19 03:32:14 · answer #3 · answered by Christian Sinner 7 · 0 0

There is no Scriptural reference to "God the Son."

Jesus himself said in John 10:36 "Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I SAID, I AM THE SON OF GOD?"

Luke 1:32 tells us that Jesus was, not the Highest, but the SON OF the Highest: "He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David."

And who is this "Highest" of whom he is the Son?

We read in Psalm 83:18 - "That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the MOST HIGH [or HIGHEST] over all the earth."

In Exodus 6:3 JEHOVAH is referred to as the ALMIGHTY, which is synonymous with "HIGHEST."

http://www.watchtower.org/e/20050422/article_01.htm
(Is Jesus Christ God?)

http://www.watchtower.org/e/20050915/article_01.htm
(Who Is Jesus Christ?)

http://www.watchtower.org

2007-11-19 03:31:20 · answer #4 · answered by Abdijah 7 · 0 0

He is the Son of God, equal with God, and with authority from the Father

“Then they all said, ‘Are You then the Son of God?’ So He said to them, ‘You rightly say that I am’” (Luke 22:70).

“For whoever does the will of My Father in heaven is My brother and sister and mother" (Matthew 12:50).

“Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, ‘All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth’” (Matthew 28:18).

“Therefore the Jews sought all the more to kill Him, because He not only broke the Sabbath, but also said that God was His Father, making Himself equal with God” (John 5:17-22).

“I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father but by me” (John 14:6).

It’s also interesting to note that Jesus did not call himself the destination, but the way, indicating that while salvation is immediate for the confessed and forgiven sinner, our Christian walk is a journey.

read "What Jesus Said of Himself" at http://www.christianity.com/Christian%20Foundations/Jesus/1322935/

2007-11-19 03:58:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

He never claimed Himself to be a god. He was just a prophet. The Jews and the Muslims believe He was a prophet of god - just like Moses, Abraham, Joseph, Mary.
The Muslims call Jesus - ISSA

2007-11-19 03:24:05 · answer #6 · answered by Iniaz 3 · 1 2

This is from a Muslim. The issue of the Godhead of Jesus was addressed by the council of Nicene about twenty centuries ago. It is referred to as the doctorine of the Nicene Creed.

The doctrine is formally defined in the Nicene Creed, which declares Jesus to be: "God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father."

The doctrine of the Trinity took centuries to develop, but the roots of the doctrine can be seen from the first century.

The word "Trinity" is not found in the New Testament, nor is the doctrine explicitly taught there. However, foundations of the concept of the Trinity can be seen in the New Testament, especially in the Gospel of John, one of the latest and most theologically developed of the New Testament books.

Hints of Trinitarian beliefs can also be seen in the teachings of extra-biblical writers as early as the end of the first century. However, the clearest early expression of the concept came with Tertullian, a Latin theologian who wrote in the early third century. Tertullian coined the words "Trinity" and "person" and explained that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit were "one in essence - not one in Person."

About a century later, in 325, the Council of Nicea set out to officially define the relationship of the Son to the Father, in response to the controversial teachings of Arius. Led by bishop Athanasius, the council established the doctrine of the Trinity as orthodoxy and condemned Arius' teaching that Christ was the first creation of God. The creed adopted by the council described Christ as "God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance (homoousios) with the Father."

Nicea did not end the controversy, however. Debate over how the creed (especially the phrase "one substance") ought to be interpreted continued to rage for decades. One group advocated the doctrine that Christ was a "similar substance" (homoiousios) as the Father. But for the most part, the issue of the Trinity was settled at Nicea and, by the fifth century, never again became a focus of serious controversy.

Most post-Nicene theological discussion of the Trinity consisted of attempts to understand and explain such a unique concept. Gregory of Nyssa, in his treatise, That There are Not Three Gods, compared the divinity shared by the three persons of the Trinity to the common "humanness," or human nature, that is shared by individual human beings. (Ironically, this initially promising explanation has been seen by some to yield a conclusion quite opposite than the title of his work.)

Saint Augustine, one of the greatest thinkers of the early church, described the Trinity as comparable to the three parts of an individual human being: mind, spirit, and will. They are three distinct aspects, yet they are inseparable and together constitute one unified human being.

2007-11-19 03:24:08 · answer #7 · answered by jkhawaja 4 · 1 1

Jesus and God are 1.

jesus is the son of god, he never claimed to be god.

2007-11-19 03:23:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I believe He was the son of God not God.
Otherwise How do you account for:
"This is My beloved Son in whome I am well pleased"
and His ultimate sacrifice to Himself for the forgiveness of sins

2007-11-19 03:33:17 · answer #9 · answered by Twm 2 · 1 0

yes, Christ was God in the flesh.....he claimed to be the son of God and the son of man......but he will return King of Kings and Lord of Lords

2007-11-19 03:26:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers