2007-11-19 01:59:48 · 8 answers · asked by dr jin 1 in Food & Drink ➔ Other - Food & Drink
of course cooked rice. calories are always calculated on cooked food and not raw food.
2007-11-19 03:22:35 · answer #1 · answered by neesha 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously the cooked rice, since we cannot eat 100 grams (plus) of raw uncooked rice just like that !!!
2007-11-19 02:17:02 · answer #2 · answered by Ganesh 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, calories are calculated for both cooked and uncooked foods. Foods lose some amount of calories and nutrients during heating. If you are looking on the packaging, it will usually specify what is meant (i.e., serving size = 1/4 c uncooked). I would recommend using the USDA Nutrient Database. It has information for thousands of foods (cooked and uncooked). http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/
2007-11-19 17:38:37 · answer #3 · answered by DMV 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, if it says it somewhat is the cooked energy, that is one cup cooked energy. One cup uncooked doubles while cooked. in many situations on the returned or in recipes they advise to degree it uncooked, yet pointing out cooked potential in any different case.
2016-11-12 02:11:55 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I always assumed cooked, as the packaging doesn't say different. (The same with pasta.) However, it's a good question and I'll pop back later to see if anybody has a definitive answer.
2007-11-19 02:06:31 · answer #5 · answered by Vegan_Mom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cooked rice
2007-11-19 04:46:54 · answer #6 · answered by jai_0885 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say the edible product...cooked!
2007-11-19 02:05:18 · answer #7 · answered by ~ Floridian`` 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
duno
2007-11-19 02:03:25 · answer #8 · answered by krups 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋