The original, of course! The Sturmgewehr 44.
Of course, if I actually needed to USE this chioce of weapon for anything, it'd be a REAL rifle caliber. M14 or semi auto version or the very fine FN/FAL. Probably a Springfield SOCOM II.
2007-11-19 07:30:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by DJ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Concur with DJ.
Having played with real M16s, AKs, M14s, and M60s 'till I had my fill and having been schooled by an old PJ on the merits of aimed fire over sprayin' and prayin', I have no use for full auto capability. Given that, if I had to take posession of a true assault rifle it would be a StG44 just for the historic significance.
2007-11-19 10:37:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by gunplumber_462 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Back in my youth, in Vietnam, I picked up a Thompson Sub machine gun. I just loved that thing. It was an M1 version. I found it to be surprisingly accurate and controllable, if I didn't try to squeeze off the entire 30 round stick magazine. If I had a spare 10 or 15 thousand burning a hole in my pocket, I'd buy one in a heartbeat. Just a good, solid gun. Plastic and lightweight alloys just don't hold a candle to real steel and wood.
2007-11-18 20:39:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
FN-FAL 308 calibre. great design by a Belgian and used by very many militaries around the world. I know its called the L1A1 in Canada and it was given to me for 2 weeks work. I had the choice of it or an AR-15.
2007-11-18 21:22:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by ogr8bearded1 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
The H&K MP5/10. It is light, accurate, and reliable, and easily accepts a "can". My second choice would be the Atchisson AA-12, the assault shotgun, with the drum magazine. Basically a machine-shotgun. Clear a room? consider it done.
2007-11-19 05:30:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Stephen H 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
In a sense it doesn't quite qualify as an assault rifle but the new LMG 5.56 from Knight's Armament, or the SR-25 M110 SASS. Either would make me very happy!!
http://www.knightarmco.com/lmg.html
http://www.knightarmco.com/sr_25.html
2007-11-19 01:03:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Maker 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
relies upon, if i could be scuffling with able like Europe i could want a M-sixteen, good accuracy, long selection, gentle weight. If i became a conscript, or a unskilled fighter i could want a Ak-40 seven, i does not might desire to bathe it, i might desire to abuse it, and ammunition could be considerable. If i became in a city section like Baghdad i could like perchance a M-4. gentle weight, short so its ordinary to pass- in a city eviorment its frequently the guy who can react the quickest- and a split 2nd could make a large distinction, and the shorter, gentle weight M-4 might desire to furnish you that split 2nd. even however i hear many people choose the M-14- its very efficient, can kill at a million,000 yards, the only difficulty is its very heavy from what i hear.
2016-09-29 12:19:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The term assault is a liberal term for a semi-auto firearm with varying features.
As far as functionality, my preference for a service Rifle remains my CAR15.. Semi-auto pre-ban. (can accept 20, 30 round magazines.).. I use my primary for target and varmints. And keep enough ammo for a SHTF possibility in a
Frau Hitlery presidency.
I do have an AK as well in my "gun library" .. It's fun to shoot but for handsdown accuracy opt for an AR
2007-11-19 07:02:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The Colt CAR-15.
2007-11-18 23:32:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by WC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
not sure what an assault rifle is other than the gun-banners made up name for comsetically enhanced rifles to sccare soccer moms with
but if I had to choose a rifle it would be a barret 50 bmg
there is just something about killing trees at 1 and a half miles that I like
2007-11-19 00:47:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by 1 free American 5
·
1⤊
2⤋