2007-11-18 17:13:53 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
refusing one make one look so guilty
2007-11-18 17:34:01 · update #1
I suppose they could ask if he would take one. It is his right to refuse it. If I were in shoes (and actually innocent), I would not take one. First, they are not that reliable. Second, your test results depend on the interpretation of the tester. Third, the stress of all the publicity and outright hounding that has been going on could skew the test.
Too much to risk. . .
2007-11-18 19:37:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He has the right to refuse a lie detector test.
2007-11-18 17:28:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's what I don't get.Sooooooooo much red tape could be cut if only they just did a lie detector test for every trial.
2007-11-18 17:23:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lie detector test results are NOT admissable in court *anywhere* in the US, because they're "Voodoo Science", and completely unreliable.
Richard
2007-11-18 17:53:52 · answer #4 · answered by rickinnocal 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The 2 previous posters obviously know very little about polygraph.
2007-11-18 23:53:59 · answer #5 · answered by E V 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋