True.
Utopia. We all believe the same thing/don't give a crap about what others believe/don't try to change others.
Won't be done unless we all agree to it.
The differing opinions on this question alone show that it cannot be done.
2007-11-18 14:08:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
true but it certainly would be better the no religion.a one religion authority may also cause an earth civil war due to corruption and the rest of such an authorities disadvantages.the most important is that you can't have a healthy society based on lies.
your question will finally end in another major one:an-archy=no-authority.when will it be ready to be applied?why is the today's misconception of the word and it's meaning?
***sorry those cookies must have been baked with something weird inside**
2007-11-18 14:09:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ψ 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
False. It was tried 200 years after the death of Christ when the bible was written and people were either forced to or cajoled into converting. Then the Christian Kings sent crusaders to conquer the non Christians. Then the Church declared anyone who was not with them to be declared Devil worshipers! One or None? I would say we should just tolerate each other and respect those with different beliefs, not force ours on them!
2007-11-18 14:19:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rev. Kaldea 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
False to the "one religion". That's what most of the fighting is about. Who's religion will it be?
No religion might be a good start though.
Peace.
2007-11-18 14:12:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by -Tequila17 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Religion = guiding knowledge,
World Peace = science,
Guiding Knowledge = science,
God = faith,
Faith = Altruism,
Religion = leadership,
So, no leadership, no Peace but plenty of religion that have a guiding knowledge of science which leads to World Peace.
2007-11-18 14:17:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by wacky_racer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lack of religion is not going to change the fact that there are leaders who are greedy, violent, powermongering men who will not yield and need to be dealt with in, most often, a forceful manner.
So, the answer is false.
2007-11-18 14:17:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by TroothBTold 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
No religion equals more peace in certain areas (Middle East) but not world peace. There will always be a war somewhere
2007-11-18 14:08:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by thundermaster85 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
(Ephesians 4:3-6) 3 earnestly endeavoring to observe the oneness of the spirit in the uniting bond of peace. 4 One body there is, and one spirit, even as YOU were called in the one hope to which YOU were called; 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism; 6 one God and Father of all [persons], who is over all and through all and in all.
And Soon ALL On Earth Will Know
2007-11-18 14:14:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
As long as there are resources to fight over there will always be wars. It has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with money and resources.
yes we still would fight over resources
2007-11-18 14:09:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Tolerance = peace. It's not that there is more than one religion, and I don't think the absence of religion would solve the issue either. The problem is the idea that 'I'm right and you're wrong and I need to kill you if you don't agree with me". A mulitiude of tolerant and understanding religions wouldn't bother me one bit!
2007-11-18 14:08:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Katie Short, Atheati Princess 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
False - religion is not the only reason people fight or argue.
2007-11-18 14:09:31
·
answer #11
·
answered by Persephone 6
·
0⤊
3⤋