It really depends on the age of the younger person in the relationship. At 17 and under they should be within 1 to 2 years. Any older then that and it could seem perverse to some people. 18 to 25 I'd say about 10 years. 25 to 30 then no more then 15 years older. When you start talking 20 or more years older it just gets kind of creepy factoring in that they are now old enough to be your parent.
However, it really is up to you and how much value you place on public opinion. If you are that interested in the person it's your choice.
I dated a man who was 11 years older then I was. It ended because of immaturity. Though it was HIS immaturity that caused the break up, lol.
2007-11-18 14:07:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by MISS H 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that a 24 yr old would be appropriate dating anyone from 21 to 29 yrs old. The older you get, the larger the age span. For example, in high school, i would recommend from 1 yr younger to one year older. As you mature, the age difference matters less and less. But I would think that a 24 yr old would find most 20 yr olds too immature.
2007-11-18 14:12:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by old beatnik 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
the greater youthful you are the greater super an age distinction seems. So like 22 and 25 are not all that distinctive yet 9 and 12 are. i don't think of that 3 years is a rather enormous age distinction yet i do sense like 14 may be too youthful to this element somebody it extremely is 3 years older than you (particularly because of the fact you're purely approximately to teach 14 and this boy would desire to be approximately to teach 18 or some thing). He sounds like a respectable adequate youngster yet you will desire to truly flow on your parents and spot in the event that they're mushy with this. you have customary one yet another for a while so waiting won't kill you. even nonetheless I do in my opinion sense that 15 is the age to commence courting and which you will desire to persist with a three year age hollow max till you're on your 20's.
2016-10-01 03:17:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
uhm you should have been more spicific with your question. My rule of thumb is normally no more or less than 4 years. I have dated someone 10 years older than me but it only lasted a few months. The real difference is where the person you want to date is in their life verses where you are. A person in their twenties is not looking for the same things a person in their mid thirties is c what i mean. My ex is dating a woman about 8 years older than him and I dont look highly upon him for it but that is his choice not mine.
2007-11-18 14:05:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by fantasy gal 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I'm 37 and I've dated a woman 13 years older than me. It depends on the person I guess.
2007-11-18 14:08:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by CSA_NP 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think 5 years younger or older would be appropriate.
2007-11-18 14:03:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Blessed 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
16 but for my daughter 35
2007-11-18 14:01:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
for a girl-i think she can date up to 10 years older.
2007-11-18 14:03:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would say generally no more than 10 years difference but as you know its all respective of the personalities involved.
2007-11-18 14:06:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by claire 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
id say anywere between 20 and 28 for you...
2007-11-18 14:02:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Allan O 3
·
0⤊
0⤋