I also own a fair number of assault weapons, why do the tree-hugging liberals have a problem with that?
2007-11-18 10:36:02 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Outdoor Recreation ➔ Hunting
Because they are scared of what they don't understand. That and they are idiots.
2007-11-18 10:40:28 · answer #1 · answered by River 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I am a tree-hugging, gun owning liberal. I don't carry concealed, but i have considered it and believe it is within my rights to do so (provided I go through the proper channels for becoming licensed and whatnot). I'm sure you can see where people are coming from when they oppose weapon ownership... they are genuinely afraid for their lives, because they're worried some psychotic revolutionary will form an arsenal in their home, then go randomly shoot up a town or school full of innocent people. Can't blame them for that. I just believe that legal or not, psychos will get weapons if they want to... so no point in making it illegal. Anyway, don't lump all liberals into the same category... i try my best not to lump all republicans into the category war-loving, earth-destructing, uneducated rednecks.
2007-11-18 18:42:23 · answer #2 · answered by Molly D 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
i don't know.
My dad is actually hunting right now, with my sister! and has 2 floor to wall gun safes which are filled with various weapons. He calls it a hobby, I call it "where I'm going if we're ever under attack here")
Him, my 2 brothers and my sis, all carry concealed. Out of sight out of mind.
I think I would too, but my temper is set off quicker than a hair trigger pistol! It could be a disaster!
Good for you, and Enjoy!
PS. i consider myself a liberal, but only because my beliefs haven't fallen into any one category yet.
2007-11-18 18:45:18 · answer #3 · answered by Tami 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Stupidity
2007-11-18 20:31:40 · answer #4 · answered by ty16_69 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ignorance.
2007-11-18 18:45:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because they enjoy being victims and try to support "victim's rights." Also, most of them have probably never read the second amendment.
Better to pack and never have to use your gun, than be in a situation that requires a gun and not have one.
2007-11-18 18:41:39 · answer #6 · answered by dlisee 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because they need victims to advance their agenda.
2007-11-18 18:59:10 · answer #7 · answered by Steel Rain 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think it's good.
2007-11-18 20:20:47 · answer #8 · answered by seven_sixtwo 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋