If life begins at conception...then shouldn't a pregnant woman be able to claim the baby on her taxes?
2007-11-18 09:37:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes, that is a totally acceptable idea.
2007-11-18 09:42:07 · answer #1 · answered by bwlobo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When she successfully delivers that child she will be able to claim it for 18-24 years.
But you are trying to mix God's laws and man's laws which are not necessarily compatible and become less compatible every day.
2007-11-18 17:50:51 · answer #2 · answered by deacon 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
...and miscarriages have to be investigated by police as potential homicides.
a better question for fundies: how does once claim abortion is murder when the bible clearly treats the caused-loss of a fetus as something different?
2007-11-18 17:49:33 · answer #3 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
And shouldn't they add about 9 months to their age? Ask them how old they are, and they will give you years from birth, not conception. That is very telling to me.
2007-11-18 17:41:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Repel the tax law!
Interestingly, the Chinese include the nine months of pregancy when they count their age!
2007-11-18 17:43:29 · answer #5 · answered by Averell A 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Considering all the expenses associated with pregnancy and childbirth, I think that would be an excellent idea.
2007-11-18 17:44:49 · answer #6 · answered by Amalthea 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a fundie, but definitely not. You don't have to feed, clothe, and provide shelter for a fetus in utero, genius.
2007-11-18 17:43:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
yes
2007-11-18 19:20:43 · answer #8 · answered by bongobeat25 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So you would base a child's right to live on whether or not it is taxed?
wow
That is cold
2007-11-18 17:42:19 · answer #9 · answered by kenny p 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋