Here is the video on You Tube;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9kmjW73-v4
I honestly think that when they were kids, they watched too many Ray Harryhausen movies and believed they were documentaries!
PLEASE do some reading people, and I DON'T mean the crap from charlatans like Kirk Cameron or Kent Hovind, I mean REAL science from acreditied scientists.
Just once, leave the fairy tales on the shelf.
2007-11-18 01:10:12 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Don,
"Science is just religion disguised as fact."
Um, no. You see religion has NO basis in fact. It is a combination of lies, myths and fairy-tales.
Science is based in what is measurable, verifiable and testable.
So you see Science and Religion are about as far from each other on the reality spectrum as you can get.
Is that too hard for you to understand?
2007-11-18 01:16:20 · update #1
Jason,
You DO understand the irony between comparing the bible to Harry Potter don't you?
Since you probably don't (and your furrowing your brow in a vain attempt to understand right about now) I'll spell it out for you;
JK Rowling's books and the bible have something in common: they are both books of fantasy. No reality between either of them.
Science on the other hand can stand up to scrutiny. Religion on the other hand, cannot.
See the difference yet?
2007-11-18 02:39:44 · update #2
John,
LOL thanks for the laugh! Most of those "scientists" have no real or credible basis in biology, osteology or any other field directly related to Evolution.
Sorry but that list made it on Snopes.com a long time ago.
Try, try again...
2007-11-18 02:41:46 · update #3
And the Flintstones. Damn you Hanna-Barbera!
This is even better proof than Hovind could get ever offer that people lived with dinosaurs!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_Oj1Yx80uc
2007-11-18 01:13:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Are you trying to tell me that the Flintstones wasn't based on a real story?
Er sorry about that. Some areas are having problems with bears. It'd *really* suck if there were raptors.
Thank you for asking the question. Thoughts of how nice it really is not to live with dinos makes that damn noisy dog across the street much easier to put up with.
2007-11-18 09:42:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey atheist,
Is Yahoo answers where you get the silly idea that godlessness and good sense can co-exist?
PLEASE do some reading. I don't mean the crap like J.K. Rowling, I mean REAL reading from God's word.
Just once, leave the Harry Potter fairy tales on the shelf.
2007-11-18 09:17:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Just when in the creationist school of "science" did fossils go from being "the devil put them there to tempt our disbelief" to being just "hard bones from animals that recently lived with man." I mean was it because of new peer-reviewed research in the Journal of Magnificent Pseudoscience or something?
2007-11-18 09:15:16 · answer #4 · answered by Dendronbat Crocoduck 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
In the bible it nwould make sense for humans to be in the garden of eden. Also couldn't they be on Gods time in eden which seems longer than our own.
2007-11-18 09:16:16 · answer #5 · answered by (o_o) 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Agreed.
British expat Atheist
Philippines
2007-11-18 09:13:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes - too larger dose of Hollywood - too desperate to cling to myths.
2007-11-18 09:15:18 · answer #7 · answered by Freethinking Liberal 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Barney was a creationist in disguise.
2007-11-18 09:13:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I thought is was that Saturday morning program "Land of the Lost!"
2007-11-18 09:13:21 · answer #9 · answered by atheist 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Here is a link to 700+ scientist (accredited as you say) who think a little differently than you.
http://www.whoisyourcreator.org/assets/PDF's/Dissent%20List%20October%202007.pdf
2007-11-18 09:17:08 · answer #10 · answered by Higgy Baby 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋