English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what is more true religion or science

2007-11-17 20:50:44 · 22 answers · asked by hyper 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

22 answers

Evolution isn't science. Science was created by God. Stop with the separation of religion and science because it all comes from God. Gravity and all the other parts of science were created by God. And as Genesis plainly states, he made Adam out of the dust of the ground.

2007-11-17 20:57:55 · answer #1 · answered by 1080 6 · 3 6

There is a school of thought that suggests Adam and Eve were leaders of two large tribes and that their union was the merging of the tribes. Coming together for the common good of the tribes.
To me, it's reasonable to understand that we evolved from apes to the stage of awareness. A time when man actually developed a spark of intelligence highlighted by the union of two tribes.
But then, I wasn't there so what do i know?

2007-11-17 20:59:08 · answer #2 · answered by pagananimist 1 · 0 0

Its not a matter of which one is more true. The old testament was written before Jesus, so a priest wrote genisis, the Bible conflicts with itself in the creation story, its meant to be metaphorical, not taken literaly.

Scientists dont techinically think we came from apes, we came from the same ancestor that apes came from. And while there is some evidence, its not super concrete.

Your best bet is to believe in evolution, theres evidence, and it doesn't conflict with religion once you see religion is more than just taking the bible literally.

Only time will tell, but because the Bible is old and not trying to come up with an answer, it is science that will ultimately let us know where we came from. Which, when you think about it in a religious manner, doesnt really matter.

2007-11-17 20:58:34 · answer #3 · answered by ianmac77 2 · 0 2

We are not descended from apes, but apes are related to the human race. Adam and Eve refer to the human race, not just 2 people. I think that when we came into being it was almost like various strains of our dna started being dominate in various creatures. So there were more than 2 of us when we came to be.

2007-11-17 21:39:35 · answer #4 · answered by Joe 4 · 0 0

Well who would you believe more Primitive Bronze Age men or 21st Century Scientists? I am going to go with 21st Century Science. The statement that Apes are our ancestors shows a lack of knowledge on the subject.

2007-11-17 21:01:46 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 1 1

Maybe there were to apes named Adam and Eve

2007-11-17 21:16:22 · answer #6 · answered by barcode soul (almost suspended) 5 · 0 1

read quran chapter two verse 29 to so on
that would help you if you are serious
Who has made the earth your couch, and the heavens your canopy; and sent down rain from the heavens; and brought forth therewith fruits for your sustenance; then set not up rivals unto Allah when ye know (the truth).

Those who break Allah's Covenant after it is ratified, and who sunder what Allah has ordered to be joined, and do mischief on earth: these cause losses (only) to themselves.

Then did Satan make them slip from the (Garden), and get them out of the state (of felicity) in which they had been. We said: "Get ye down, all (ye people), with enmity between yourselves. On earth will be your dwelling place and your means of livelihood for a time."

2007-11-17 21:12:46 · answer #7 · answered by Abbas 4 · 0 1

I think the Bible is true, science is fact, and Man messes both up.

2007-11-17 21:45:33 · answer #8 · answered by mecasa 4 · 0 0

incest or primates?

well, since adam had a XY chromosomes his DNA could not have supplied the necessary components to make a woman, just as mary's DNA did not contain the Y chromosome to make a man by herself.

asexual reproduction means you make something identical to yourself, so it's definitely not adam and eve.

2007-11-17 20:59:13 · answer #9 · answered by eelai000 5 · 1 2

Adam and Eve. There is no evidence that humans evolved from apes. Even Charles Darwin confessed that his theory offered no proof. "NOT ONE CHANGE OF SPECIES INTO ANOTHER IS ON RECORD. We cannot
prove that a single species has ever changed." - Charles Darwin

\

2007-11-17 21:01:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers