English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Evolutionists, I have a challenge for you. Can you show me(a link, a book, etc.) of any cooked Macaroni and Cheese prior to 4000 B.C? Show me any evidence of Macaroni and Cheese dating back longer than 4000 B.C. Show me any writings, recipes, ingredients, Utensils, countries that ate Macaroni and Cheese, ANY evidence of Macaroni and Cheese. I am under the impression that evolution is a big hoax, but if you can prove me wrong, then I will embrace evolution. And I don't mean showing me a piece of Pasta or cooking jug you claim is 20,000 years old. Show me any recorded Macaroni and Cheese history, if you can.

2007-11-17 18:26:52 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Please note that i will not believe anything you have to say.

2007-11-17 18:27:10 · update #1

Unless you can bring me some Macaroni and Cheese that TASTES like it is from before 4000 BCE.

2007-11-17 18:27:41 · update #2

15 answers

I doubt you will believe me as you seem to have your mind made up. I personally have a box of unmade Macaroni from the prehistoric Era though. I could let you look at it for $5.95. This is quite the deal.

2007-11-17 18:41:02 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2 0

Science tells us that macaroni was invented in 6054 B.C., but was not used much because it was too hard and crunchy. In 5235 B.C. the method of boiling it in water was introduced into mainstream family kitchens. The Big Cookbook says that a woman named Michelle, in about 5001 B.C., after draining a big pot of cooked macaroni, accidently knocked over a jar of Cheeze Whiz and it fell into the pot. This is verified in the Big Cookbook, which is the word of Kraft. Thus it is proven.

2007-11-17 18:48:11 · answer #2 · answered by Petrushka's Ghost 6 · 1 0

they only hate evolution because of the fact it proves that the Genesis introduction tale isn't actually actual (or actual in any experience probable, nonetheless i'm advantageous you ought to use it as a metaphor or draw training from it such as you will from aesops fables.) yet do not seem down on creationists, they're taught a pretend straw guy version of evolution, then the educators knock that down, and that they think of that evolution is fake, regardless of the shown fact that that's merely the fake misunderstood version of evolution they outfitted up of their heads it extremely is fake. i think yet another notice for it would be brainwashing, different than that it isnt intentional in the experience that the educators rather have faith it themselves. yet yeah, the entire denying evolution is predicated off of lack of understanding of what the actual concept easily says. If there is an evolution denier interpreting this, please examine the thought from non religious materials. i used to be a youthful earth creationist, however the actual concept (the single they don't practice you in christian college or church) is easily very stable supported by utilising an countless quantity of information. EDIT: lots of the evolution deniers i'm interpreting approximately indexed under are utilising the probably clever yet mistaken arguments that i replaced into taught while i replaced right into a youthful earth creationist... rather men, i urge you to examine the actually concept as a replace of spouting the help of a creationist internet site. it extremely is stable. study (i comprehend you hate this guy) Richard Dawkins' e book "the main suitable teach in the international" and another evolution books. they're going to sparkling up some uncomplicated misconceptions you have gained from youthful earth creationists.

2016-09-30 23:43:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

mac and cheese wasnt even a combination dish till the 1800's. i dont even believe they made pasta back then sweetheart. it obviously took evolution to gain the knowledge to do so. another example. pizza wasnt introduced till the 1900's. i dont even think people seasoned food back then.

2007-11-17 18:43:51 · answer #4 · answered by Little Miss WONDERFUL 6 · 0 0

I would be persuaded if they could just prove that cheese existed before 4000 BC.

2007-11-17 18:34:18 · answer #5 · answered by supertop 7 · 2 1

Haha nice. This brings up that dude that would pay anyone 250,000 if someone could prove evolution to him without him having a reason against it. No one could do it for 10 years [and still cant].

2007-11-17 18:40:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

You never ate in my high schools cafeteria. If you had, you'd be writing a book with Dawkins right about now....Which, oddly enough, was a fundamentalist christian high school, so i guess to some that would make it more believable.

2007-11-17 18:32:15 · answer #7 · answered by Hatir Ba Loon 6 · 7 0

Like I already said, I don't want you to gain the knowledge you've already failed miserably at gaining. It's nice being smarter than other people. I guess you'll just have to take my word on that one, though because I don't think you'll ever know that feeling.

2007-11-17 18:36:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

How can anyone believe a fairy tale like the Flying Spaghetti Monster? They are deceived and ignoring science.

Very nicely done.

2007-11-17 18:33:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

of course mac and cheese existed

they just didn't have a name for it back then

2007-11-18 00:08:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers