What is the strongest evidence against the God Hypothesis?

Question

To me it`s the historical evidence. The whole Christian fable comes from pagan mythology/astrology. The bible itself is pretty compelling evidence against the Christian God. If you can prove that the source itself is not valid there`s no need to dwell on the irrationalites, absurdities, contradictions in the source. (Why break the lightbulb when you can hit the lightswitch?)

What say you?

Answer 1

The fact that it's logically impossible.

Answer 2

Greetings! thank you on your innovations. you're making some exciting factors. listed under are some issues to evaluate, and that i in basic terms say them kindly. First, i might believe you from the point of view that faith can't be a stable factor if we are actually not testing what we certainly have self assurance to be sure whether this is authentic. faith can dumb us down if we don't evaluate the somewhat some data accessible. I particularly have self assurance the Bible to be the notice of God, yet i don't in basic terms choose yet somebody else to have self assurance that by using fact I reported so. i choose the guy to accomplish a little study and locate out on their very own based on the data he or she shows. between the main effectual artifacts of information to assist the Bible as God's notice is the ineffective Sea Scrolls. as an occasion, the ineffective Sea Scrolls for Isaiah reads the comparable by using fact the e book of Isaiah it quite is interior the Bibles we study at present. it is the data that God's words have been preserved. The e book of Isaiah, which grew to become into written approximately seven hundred to 800 years earlier Jesus got here on the scene, has distinctive prophecies interior it approximately Jesus, that ended up coming authentic. With all due appreciate the belief of the Holy Spirit grew to become into around earlier Theophilus. Jesus reported that He and the father are one in John 10:30. additionally, Jesus stated the Comforter, that's the Holy Spirit, coming to the disciples after He leaves in John sixteen:7. there is likewise a prophecy interior the previous testomony in Isaiah and the Psalms approximately Jesus being the Son of God in Isaiah 7:14, Isaiah 9:6, and Psalms 2:7. The crucifixion of Jesus is prophesied in Psalm 22:sixteen. traditionally and scientifically the Christian faith could be defended. The Bible confirms that the earth is a sphere in Isaiah 40:22. It confirms that mild strikes and the air has weight in job 38: 19-20 and job 28:25. The loose waft of earth in area is shown in job 26:7. additionally, wind blowing in cyclones is shown in Ecclesiastics a million:6 understanding Jesus is nicely worth each little thing. i urge human beings out of like to grant Him a gamble. you will not remorseful approximately it.

Answer 3

part of the problem is the assertion that there is a hypothesis to begin with.

if something is a certain way... and a perception/belief of it for some reason is skewed, inaccurate, flawed, or otherwise not exactly the nature of it... without the observer knowing their perception/belief to be flawed, does not change the validity of the existance of the thing... it just means that the method of perception needs to be improved.

if I hold up a colored sphere, one person can see it as clearly as there is to see, another's color vision is not proper in some manner, and the colors do not look as they actually are... and a third person can't see it at all, (they can touch it, so they know the sphere is there, they just can't observe it to have or lack any color whatsoever, one way or the other.

now, to the blind person, seeing their perspective as the valid objective one, both the other two are equally legitimate, and equally meaningless.

now, perceptively the blind person can't personally tell the difference between the two. now the fact that they may be able to find fault with the perceptions of the flawed perceiver, does not mean that the ball has no color. .. it simply means that there is a flaw in the perception that can be recognized by the blind person.

now, its not an entirely inconceivable from a certain perspective, to figure "from what I can see these 2 other perspectives seem to be trivially different, and equally absurd. somewhat disproving one most likely means the other is equally invalid" as a path of reasoning. and that makes some sense.

but please, at least try to define between the actuality or potential actaulity of something, and what some people believe. they can be wrong on many things without the core part that you, as an outsider, attach those wrong-points to mean.

Answer 4

There would never be a "God Hypothesis" if not for someone's imaginings in trying to explain the inexplicable. People's intuitive nature to understand the things around them has led to some unintelligent things being hypothesized. If people were content to simply say "I don't know why such and such is/happens, but let's look into it", the idea of God would have never been imagined.

Answer 5

Actually, the fact that there's no evidence of a historical Jesus Christ and that the mythology is most likely a fable is the strongest evidence against the Christ hypothesis, not the God one.

The strongest evidence against is basically the same though, no positive evidence for and the likelihood that the whole "god" thing is a myth is through the roof.

Answer 6

The absolute LACK of any evidence for the existence of any god.

Answer 7

I've looked back at allot of your questions I've answered over the last couple of weeks, and some of your questions are similar only re-worded and phrased differently. At first, you seemed to me to truly be a person just asking questions with no hidden motive or insults behind them, but I find myself questioning my first impression. I truly enjoy engaging in intelligent conversations with people of all faiths and personal beliefs, and learning about what they believe, as long as it is done respectfully. I hope you are not one of those individuals on here that has hidden motives behind their questions and is just out to insult those who believe differently. Anyway, I have to answer your question with a question....What evidence, and be specific? You named both history and the bible as "evidence against the Christian God." Please share with me and the rest of us this evidence you speak of. I want to hear it for myself. In order for this question to even be answered, one must first be made aware of the so called evidence. Peace.

Answer 8

I say, no man need argue that there is no god..... Because it is evident in voices such as yours that there is none..... and the louder those voices, the easier it is for one who has never heard to believe in the things that you say.... Certainly, it is easier to close the eyes than to focus.....

Very difficult to see with eyes closed... and yet, there are those who claim to have seen it all and will tell you what it means......So, be wise.... in all ways...... and perhaps, your sight will become clear...... and by that time, you wont say a thing.....


Your sister,
Ginger,
((dream interpreter for over 20 years))

Answer 9

What is wrong with you, honestly I am concerned. Man I hope you are just drunk. How is the word of God evidence against him? You make no sense. The only POSSIBLE evidence that God isn't real is that he isn't visible, I know he is real.

Answer 10

The fact that there is no evidence for a god.

Answer 11

You ask for a scientific answer about God and then go into a tirade about Christianity. I would insert here a response in favor of the God hypothesis. I would like someone to tell me scientifically ... From where did the "Singularity" come that went bang and became the whole known universe. I have also read that at this time the combined mass of our Galaxy is not sufficient to have enough gravity to hold it together..So what unknown force is holding it together. If you have a proven scientific answer feel free to post it here and I may rethink my Deism.