I am "the king" if you saw my other question im going to post what i wrote just incase you missed out.
"Now lets say the big bang theroy was correct and thats how the earth was created ? How can life just appear without an intelligent designer. The Earth was once filled with no life so is spontaneous generation correct life started from none living things ? How was the first cell evolved from a non living substance. I forgot his name but in the 13th century it was though that rats came from rags and magots came from meat spontaneous generation the belive that living things originated from non living things correct. But this was dissapproved it also dissaproved evolution because life just cant appear unless you belive in spontaneous generation or an intelligent design im 13 amd i figered it out now have you "
And Dont Say spontaneous generation and abiogenesis are diffierent they both have the same meaning
spontaneous generation noun biology Also Called abiogenesis "
2007-11-17
13:12:58
·
11 answers
·
asked by
battla4life p
1
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Now part two
One the other question i posted one person said that life started with organic molucules came togther ? Howver molucules are living entities thier is an intelligent designer life can not come from none life what ? when the big bang happend dna was on the meteriod or something.
2007-11-17
13:14:31 ·
update #1
It's hard to tell with such poor writing, but did you say organic molecules are alive? Do you even know what a molecule is?
Spontaneous Generation was a mistaken conclusion based on poor observation by people who didn't know how to go about it. It was easily discredited by legitimate scientific experiments.
Abiogenesis does not claim life began with a spontaneous generation of a "first cell". Components of cells developed first: amino acids, mitochondria, semi-permeable membranes and the like, little more than complex chemicals before they came into contact with each other. People who assume a magical event are simply not looking hard enough at the event to detect the natural precursors.
2007-11-17 14:16:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by skepsis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe the intelligent designer isn't concerned with things being exactly to your liking. Maybe the intelligent designer set things in motion and isn't involved anymore or is content to let things play out without his fiddling. Maybe the intelligent designer doesn't exist anymore (the universe has been around for 15 billion years or so, after all). Maybe the intelligent designer intended for adaptation and natural selection to be the method by which change occurs on Earth. Maybe the Earth is a big training exercise or simulator and it's NOT SUPPOSED to be perfect. Maybe the intelligent designer HAS updated his designs gazillions of times, but we're just last year's models. When a car company updates the design of a car they don't retrofit all existing cars on the road. Maybe the intelligent designer assigned YOU the job of making things better, but you've been so remiss in your duties that you've entirely forgot what you're here for. Maybe a billion years of our Earth time is only one second to the intelligent designer and he's just pondering his next redesign. Maybe the intelligent designer HAS made several forklift upgrades to the Earth, but has done it in such a way that there is no physcial evidence of the prior version. Maybe all of creation is just a dream in the mind of the intelligent creator and as such, there is no imperative to change it to your liking. If this is the case, then you're just a dream character and it's futile to question such things. Maybe our universe is a 6th grade science project on the dresser of some alien kid in another dimension and he's just learning. Maybe we are just part of a computer simulation created 50 years in the future using rudimentary simulation software and the kid that created this universe simulation is fascinated with imperfection - after all, whether in real life or art, isn't it people's flaws that make them interesting? Maybe our intelligent creator is a screw-up and we're the result. See - if you use your imagination it's not hard to conceive that our universe could be the result of all kinds of scenarios that involve an intelligent creator. But you do yourself a disservice to rule out the possibility of one simply because you feel oppressed by religious nuts. It takes just as much faith/imagination to explain how the universe came into being WITHOUT an intelligent creator.
2016-05-24 00:56:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Repeating lies doesn't make them true. The gradual development of primitive life and the sudden rise of large numbers of vermin out of odds and ends are very different. The fact that Aristotle (4th century BCE) thought alligators came from submerged logs, does not compare to the most primitive life forming over a period of hundreds of millions of years. Abiogenesis only had to succeed once.
2007-11-17 13:33:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I just watched a NOVA program on PBS about people trying to slip Intelligent Design into a Biology course. The judge said there was no merit to ID. It wasn't science. There are people who will go to any lengths to force their religious beliefs on everyone else. This is why freedom fighters are here on R&S, to correct the falsehoods spread by some religious people.
Freedom, practice it.
Peace, only without religion.
2007-11-17 13:21:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lionheart ® 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Macro evolution, or molecules to man, is a joke and not a very funny one either since it is unproven and unprovable. You are on the right track. God created life.
2007-11-17 13:35:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by TheNewCreationist 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Troll. Go to the science section and ask your ridiculously stupid questions. When all the people there get done laughing they may answer.
2007-11-17 13:24:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The thing with science is, they don't have all the answers. There still looking. Saying god did it is a cop out, to not having to think.
2007-11-17 13:19:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by punch 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I really don't understand you're question. More details and less typos would help. And, normally I don't care about typos.
2007-11-17 13:18:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Frank B 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_generation#Spontaneous_generation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
They are NOT THE SAME THING. No scientist believes mice come from corn or maggots come from meat. Stop repeating the same stupid point. YOU ARE WRONG.
2007-11-17 13:18:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
LMAO
Your drowning in your own story.
2007-11-17 13:26:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋