STUPID EVOLUTIONIST sTUPID ATHIEST?

Question

Just kiding i dont think your stupid just knew that would get you here cause i want to know what you think of this

Now lets say the big bang theroy was correct and thats how the earth was created ? How can life just appear without an intelligent designer. The Earth was once filled with no life so is spontaneous generation correct life started from none living things ? How was the first cell evolved from a non living substance. I forgot his name but in the 13th century it was though that rats came from rags and magots came from meat spontaneous generation the belive that living things originated from non living things correct. But this was dissapproved it also dissaproved evolution because life just cant appear unless you belive in spontaneous generation or an intelligent design im 13 amd i figered it out now have you ?

spontaneous generation

noun
biology See abiogenesis

Answer 1

You "figered" something out? ROTFLMAO!!!

Answer 2

1) The Earth was not created by the Big Bang. There was some 9 billion years between the two. The Earth is the product of coalescion of orbiting matter.

2) Spontaneous generation was never considered to be at all true, it was merely hypothesised. It was disproven years before Pasteur by simply keeping said mett and rags in a contained environment.

3) It's not the fact that you're 13 that makes you sound like a child, it's your lack of knowledge in the area you're arguing. Stay in school, pay attention in biology and don't just plug your ears because your pastor tells you that's what God would want you to do.

Answer 3

Spontaneous generation of complex life goes back to Aristotle, 4th century BC. Abiogenesis, the gradual development of simple life is not spontaneous generation. This comparison is a typical Creationist deception. You're still young enough to learn the simple truth: Literal Biblical Creationists are pathological liars.

Answer 4

Here's a little light reading.

Hypotheses on Origin of Macromolecules


1.RNA-First Hypothesis

RNA could carry out processes associated with Life
Nobel Prize 1989 (Cech, Un of Colorado & Altman, Yale)
RNA can act as a substrate and/or an enzyme


2.Protein-First Hypothesis Sidney Fox (above)


Proteinoids form from amino acids at 180o
Proteinoids can form Microspheres


3.Clay catalyzed RNA & Protein synthesis (Both First)


Graham Cairns-Smith (University of Glasgow)
Clay is helpful in polymerizing Proteins & Nucleic Acids
Attracts small organic molecules
Contains zinc & iron (metal catalysts)
Collects energy from radioactive decay and releases it when Temperature and/or Humidity change.

Macromolecules to Living Cells

Took half a billion years
Event Still a Mystery

1. Prebionts
Nonliving structures that evolved into the first living cells

2. Coacervates

Organic molecules surrounded by a film of water molecules
Selectively absorb materials from surrounding water
Incorporate them into their structure
Not a random arrangement of molecules

3. Microsphere

Organic molecules surrounded by a double membrane
Can be formed from Proteinoids, when placed in boiling water & cooled.
Shrink & swell depending on the osmolarity of the water.
Can absorb material from the environment & grow & form buds.
Internal streaming similar to cells
Have been shown to form nucleic acids & polypeptides (ATP present)

Microspheres = Protocells!!

Answer 5

*drinks*

Don't look now, your ignorance is showing. Wait until you graduate high school and take a few college biology courses before you try to disprove evolution. You clearly don't know what you are talking about.

omg, you actually ARE only 13. Sorry, I was just trying to insult the intelligence of what I thought was a stupid adult. My advise still stands, however. Have a nice night!

Answer 6

You are right life needed a push to get started but like a painter god, or what ever you call the one great power let things evolve slowly over time. To believe there is a god/goddess behind creation dose not rule out evolution

Answer 7

There are things that we have not even dreamed of. Our limited minds have not reached the point to even imagine how that could be. Maybe we are both wrong. We don't know because we have not advanced that far, but we are getting closer thanks to science and research. Do you realize how stupid it is for us to argue theories? We know that live beings do evolve, that's a fact. The theory of evolution is still a theory. Creation is a theory, too. We can't prove either one. But, we have proved that we do evolve.

Answer 8

I weep for the future.

WOW you figured out the whole universe by 13. So now you can stay home read the bible and never ask another question in your life, you know ever thing.

The sad thing is that is most likely what you will do.

Answer 9

Yes the big bang theory is correct. Because it is a fact the universe is expanding. You don't know that life was formed on the earth. DNA could have traveled on a meterorid.

Answer 10

Research: abiogenesis

I'm tired of this spontaneous generation strawman. I learned the difference when I was 13 in high school biology, why didn't you?

Answer 11

So if something cannot come from nothing then where did god come from? Did he have an intelligent designer as well? According to your theory, he does. And you haven't figured anything out, you are simply regurgitating what your pastor, religion, or parents told you to believe.