if science has "overtaken" everyhting...?

Question

if science is prooving everyhting these days
and for which people have stopped believing in god,,

the why hasnt science yet bee n able to answer the SIMPLEST QUESTION EVER?

how was the universe created?

is there ny evidence?

WILL THERE BE ANY EVEIDENCE???


PLEASE BE NICE 2 ME AS ILL JUST IGNORE UR NEGATIVE ASNWERS

if u dnt agree with me just justify urslef-

dont be mean!!!!

UR NOT BEING NICE
what i meant be "simplest question" was the most --i want to know--- question
if u get me...

Answer 1

You will find that alot of sciencetific facts actually come from Religion

http://www.harunyahya.com/create01.php

Answer 2

So you're saying that since science hasn't come up with a satsifactory (at least to you) explanation of how the universe was created, it's all a bunch of crock? Basically you're saying, "never mind the whole gravity thing, germ theory, material sciences, physics, aerodynamics, chemistry, biology, geology, astrodynamics, electromagentic theory, etc., that we see proven on a day-to-day basis and that has made real improvements to quality of life, if a scientist can't give me a good explanation for the source of everything, they're all fake!". If that's what you believe, then you're holding up an unrealistic goal, one I'm sure you don't place on anything else. (Can religion explain where gods came from?)

Answer 3

Who says science has overtaken everything. Every real scientist knows there is an infinite amount of things to learn.

Crazy religious folks with nothing to do are the ones trying to start a fight with science. They are not at odds. I know plenty of Christians and Muslims agnostics and atheists who enjoy science

The universe creation is one of the most difficult questions ever. It was created 14 bil years ago. As you can imagine this makes gathering up evidence quite difficult. There is certain amount in astronomy and physics that you can read. Most of it is very complicated but one thing I have read is that a low level of even background energy is detected in a pocket of space believed to be the location of the singularity of the Big Bang

Answer 4

well, seeing as science has been right about their answers or have used their answers to lead off to more questions and theories and hypothesis. The fact that you are typing on a computer today due to science and its answer, you have electricity and running water, your health, your TV, newspaper, everything, because of science. This does not seem fact enough for you till they prove to you how the universe came into existence. Well if that's the case and you chose to continue believing in unproven, irrational religious dogma why subscribe to science at all? Why not go back into a cave and drink water from streams and get the news of events from your neighbor? Why subscribe to it, make maximum use of what it has offered you and then turn around and demand an explanation for the origin of the universe?
Are you even making sense to yourself?

Answer 5

"the [sic] why hasnt [sic] science yet bee [sic] n [sic] able to answer the SIMPLEST QUESTION EVER?"

You've set up your question with a false premise.

"how was the universe created?"

A) That's actually a HARD question to figure out the details of -- but people are working on it.
B) But it's really quite easy to answer in the general sense: THE BIG BANG.

Answer 6

Science doesn't prove things. Only mathematics has proofs. Science isn't perfect - there are new facts as we gain more evidence and understanding. We know how the universe was created - The Big Bang. We don't know the cause of that however, but it is likely the answer will one day come to us as scientists continue searching and studying.

Answer 7

The universe wasn't created. It simply formed. We're still working on how. If you really wish to know, please readdress this question to Home > Science & Mathematics > Physics or Home > Science & Mathematics > Astronomy (physics would be the more appropriate of the two).

If string theory is correct, the Big Bang was caused by the collision of two extrauniversal membranes colliding, causing a sudden influx of energy which spread out over one of the surfaces into what we see today as our universe.

-----------

PTK:

Please explain -- no scientist claims that the universe was formed from nothing. Every theory thereof asserts that something had to have existed, to (loosely put it) 'bang'.

Answer 8

I suggest you read up on the M theory and Parallel Universes for starters.

Just because we do not have a complete answer now, that does not mean we won't in the future. Did you know that at one time they did not know the Sun was composed of hydrogen? At that time the general consensus was we would never know what the Sun was made of. Of course that's all changed now. I think the same applies here.

Answer 9

The simplest question ever? Not really. You have heard of the big bang? While it is a complected theory it does answer that question, and yes there is quite a bit of evidence to support it.

You want a simple answer to a not simple question.

Answer 10

Science doesn't claim to understand everything and we would understand a whole lot more if it weren't for the negative powers of the world's religions.

The fantasies of a great creator doesn't explain anything. They base everything on faith and little on science. If it were up to religion we'd still be living on a flat Earth with the planets, our Sun and our Universe circling around us.

Answer 11

Not a simple question at all. So your question is invalid. Recall that in the old days, people usually used the concept of a Divine Being to describe things we can scientifically explain now, such as the weather and the movement of the Earth.