English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And keep them from eating all the other animals? Dont tell me baby raptors wouldn't be a problem. Did you see Jurassic Park. Them little boogers were unstoppable.

2007-11-17 00:18:16 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

13 answers

maybe he just took some raptor eggs? thats what i would have done.

a more dire problem is multiplication. he was on his boat for a while according to the bible. by the end of the trip he must have had about a thousand rabbits and half a billion fruit flies...

2007-11-17 00:57:56 · answer #1 · answered by Oliver H 1 · 0 0

absolutely you excellent presume way extra animals than the account shows were on the ark. Presumptuousness and massive assumptions are what spread faulty memories. you also anticipate that a vessel some 4,500 years previous nevertheless exists and has no longer withered over the years and weathering. no matter if some vestige of the ark nevertheless survives it would want to nevertheless be undiscovered. no matter if that's God who does no longer choose guy to locate it, then it should not be got here upon. 2d, you anticipate that the burden of falling water might want to by some ability be too a lot for the ark to face up to. third, you anticipate that the ark changed into no longer sufficiently massive and not water evidence and resistant. Fourth, definite, you presume a lot, you anticipate that there nevertheless exists evidence of the ark interior the mountain decision in which it settled. fifth, you anticipate that fish were on the ark, at the same time as water has no chance to their survival besides. sixth, you anticipate that Noah might want to no longer in basic terms throw waste overboard. seventh, you presume to imagine that the Bible must have given exact designs about insignificant positive factors of a deliver, which records had no longer something to do with why the flood happened interior the first position. We were given sufficient records to determine to truthfulness, practicality and probability of the account of the ark. a million. Ark changed into of water resistant timber and waterproofed interior and out of doors with tar. 2. useless timber does decompose over the years using time and climate. 3. there have been "varieties", no longer species, of animals on the ark. Species come from the less styles of animals. hence, there are some distance fewer styles of animals than their many species. 4. Water in basic terms rained from the sky, no longer crumple in heavy sheets. The ark changed into locate. 5. All aquatic and marine existence remained interior the waters outdoors the ark. maximum styles of animals stay interior the water. hence, there have been fewer animals on the ark than many anticipate. 6. Polar bears did not exist then, because the earth had a a lot hotter climate then with out polar caps. Polar bears are an adaptive species from the unique bear type from the ark. 7. The ark had a unified window gadget alongside the fringe of its roof, which presented ventilation, gentle and an section to collect water and put off waste.

2016-10-24 09:35:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Jurassic Park is great movie but not reality, the flood took the most of what we call the dinosaurs, there would have had only to been a core group of animals on the ark, alot of what we have today came from them, just like what happened at he tower of Babel, God scattered them out over the face of the earth.

2007-11-17 00:36:11 · answer #3 · answered by victor 7707 7 · 0 1

Those little boogers were adult composognathus.
In fact, according to the novel, the baby raptor was quite calm and cute.
Noah's ark is in fact a story, which aims to tell the relationship between God and his Creation. Nevermind what fundies say.

2007-11-17 00:44:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Who told you there were dinosaurs on the ark? Didnt you know Dinosaurs disappeared from Earth millions of years before humans showed up?

2007-11-17 00:25:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

There is not evidence to support that dinosaurs were a part of the group of animals that made to the ark; they were probably extinct long before that. However, if they were indeed in that ark, God could control all their instinct. That is why it was easy for Noah to lead them into the ark, without being attack by one of these ferocious animals.

2007-11-17 00:33:09 · answer #6 · answered by Aeon Enigma 4 · 0 2

the story of the ark took place millions of years after the dinosaurs were already gone

2007-11-17 00:21:29 · answer #7 · answered by T Leeves 6 · 1 2

The Woodhouse Way?

2007-11-17 00:22:50 · answer #8 · answered by Brendan G 4 · 2 1

Noah sedated them. He took gallons of chloroform and other anesthetics with him on the trip. The whole Noah story makes absolute sense if you stop thinking about it! Just don't think about it and blindly accept it, just as good 'ol Jesus would've wanted.

2007-11-17 00:22:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

i beleive dinosaurs existed before the time of Noah.

2007-11-17 00:29:11 · answer #10 · answered by nocturnal_monk 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers