learning is something God is incapable of if he is all-knowing.
if he has always been all-knowing, does he only experience learning through us, empathetically?
if he cannot learn, then it goes without saying that he can neither discover nor invent.
if he has always been, then so have we. perhaps not physically, but conceptually.
regardless if god made us physically, can he take credit for creating us if we have always been? or is that conception of us a portion of God which has manifested itself physically, such as Brahman beliefs to where death is merely a reconcilation with our portion of "God"?
thoughts? (no biblical scripture please. this is not a question about jesus or christianity and since the question is about discovery, a biblical answer does not qualify as a fresh idea or free-thinking)
2007-11-16
10:56:38
·
4 answers
·
asked by
eelai000
5
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
BAMAMBA
i don't think you fully appreciate the question. it is in reference to his omniscience.
if God is All-Knowing All-theTime then all things have been existence for as long as he has, being that he has been fully aware of them from the "beginning" for lack of a better word.
if that is the case, how can we consider God our "creator" if we are conceptionally as infinite as he is?(aside from the clay-breath business)
2007-11-16
11:20:51 ·
update #1
f'sho:
don't get angry. it's just a question.
and i'm not asking "who can take credit" i'm asking if anyone can, including God.
i think you may be right regarding god learning empathetically through us, but i wonder if there is a special satisfaction he gets when we learn something.
i think you confused the issue on purpose regarding whether god created us or not. i ddn't mean the physical manifestation. i made that quite clear. what i am saying is that we were not conceptually "created." how could we be? we are as infinite as God by his omniscience. we have no origin.
and thank you for keeping scripture out of your answer. it is very much appreciated.
2007-11-16
11:43:39 ·
update #2
jeancommunication:
how can you accuse me of limiting God and then quote the bible? that is blatently hypocritical.
clearly you have ignored my question entirely, changed the subjest to fit your agenda and exploited our time to try to sell bullshit.
at the same time, you have missed on an opportunity to actually contribute.
it's quite sad that you have nothing original to say.
2007-11-16
11:49:40 ·
update #3
BAMAMBA:
it is clear that my definition of omniscience is not the same as yours, the ideas that i have presented demonstrate that God does not "think" in terms of envisioning. his "thoughts" are merely rearrangements of things already in existence.
since your answer cannot fully represent what i meant by "omniscience" i feel that it may be misleading to other readers and detracts from what i had hoped to inspire regarding other people's thinking.(ironical, i know) therefore, i am afraid i have to give you a thumbs down for the purpose of suggestive action. at the same time,think you have given the best answer by far even though it does not exactly fulfill my criteria. thanks for giving me something to think about.
2007-11-16
12:11:31 ·
update #4