If they have the answers of what makes life, why can't they save life for AIDS and cancer patients? Isn't it obvious that they are more egotistical than educated?
2007-11-16 09:53:54 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
How do scientists explain (truly believably) how LIFE formed, how sound formed, how taste, speech, emotion, thought, sight, how these all formed. Do they really expect us to believe this crap about chemical changes forming life and monkeys evolving into humans (and just cells, fish, and tiny mammals before that!)? I can't believe they teach crap like this in schools. They call it "science" and "knowledge." I call it bull sh**. Total and complete bull sh**.
2007-11-16 10:01:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
If the government would fund cell research we might have a cure for cancer. Not stem cell research, just cell research.
Oxygen kills aids but oxygen can also kill people in too many doses.
Atheists don't claim to have a cure for cancer or aids. They only claim that there is no god. Some don't even believe in evolution and the big bang..
Atheists not atheist. There is a plural.
2007-11-16 19:35:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one pretends that science has all the answers. There are huge chunks of missing information and probably a lot of things we just have wrong. However, science at least has SOME of the answers. Can the same be said for religion? I don't think so.
Your characterization that atheists are not very educated is patently false. Indeed, the ONLY conclusive thing you can say about atheists, on the whole, is that they are more educated than believers, on the whole (see my source).
2007-11-16 17:58:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
We/I don't claim to have *all* the answers yet. However there are things we know and have answers for, of course as people spend their lives studying their specialty, don't expect me to deliniate everything that is known.
Many professionals are working on and improving current treatments for various diseases including AIDS and cancer. So far, the current level of treatment is helping much more than any religion...
2007-11-16 18:01:44 · answer #4 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've never heard an atheist say they have all the answers, just that the answers don't rely on someones imaginary friend fixing things for them. As for educated that's a stereotype made by someone who obviously has an ego about their beliefs
2007-11-16 17:58:40 · answer #5 · answered by shanobi187 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No. We freely admit science doesn't have a cure for AIDS or many cancers. I fail to see what one has to do with the other?
2007-11-16 17:59:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You are clearly not paying attention. While AIDS can not be cured, we understand the disease now. It is treatable, and more people are living longer. Cancer is also treatable with many survivors. These improvements in the quality of life were brought to you by science.
2007-11-16 17:57:55 · answer #7 · answered by atheist 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
You obviously are looking into the mirror. Religionists only have 1 answer, and it is the same every time, making it pretty silly. Are you more egoistical than educated. Could you have made yourself any clearer?
2007-11-16 18:24:29 · answer #8 · answered by Fred 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course science doesn't have all the answers yet, that's why scientists keep pushing. 100 years ago what are scientific facts now would have been called magic, devil worship or fantasy.
2007-11-16 17:59:47 · answer #9 · answered by Aravah 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
since when has anybody ever claimed science knew what made life? we have ideas but actually knowing is far from this day and age. just because we dont have answers now doesnt mean we wont someday.
2007-11-16 18:01:23 · answer #10 · answered by god_of_the_accursed 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋