I've just been reading through a bunch of essays and articles about how parents are supposed to be informed, and I guess it makes sense, but doesn't it seem as if then we're giving these kids nobody they can turn to? Obviously they may not be able to turn toward parents, professional counselors require parental consent, friends are being told to report to counselors, where does it end? I understand that it may be necessary but does anyone else think that it actually harms the self-injurer more because it requires dealing with it alone? I'm just wondering what ya'll think.
2007-11-16
04:28:44
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Health
➔ Mental Health
Everyone who has answered so far, is basing their answer on the fact that the parents are willing to be involved. Maybe I wasn't clear enough. What if the parents refuse to be involved, and go so far as to refuse even a counselor for their child. I've talked to CPS workers and they say that since it is not a clear sign of neglect/abuse, they will not remove a child nor demand that mandatory counseling. And let's define it even more. If the parent reacts with anger each and every time they hear about a cutting incident, and the child really wants to receive some sort of help.Then what. I know what all ya'll meant, and I probably wasn't clear enough, but now I am, so now what's your opinion. Because as much as we want all parents to want what's best for their child, some can't see above their own needs when facing a child who self-injures.
2007-11-17
07:02:33 ·
update #1