2007-11-16 04:06:45 · 6 answers · asked by HBTAD 2 in Sports ➔ Golf
Why would you spend $149 to find a golf ball that costs $2?? You'd have to lose more than 6 dozen balls before the machine pays for itself.
2007-11-16 06:47:18 · answer #1 · answered by John F 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree. send me the money and I'll find your balls better than the scout. It's a waste. Don't do it. Get better at golf instead. Spend the 149 on lessons and you will lose less balls.
2007-11-16 10:18:49 · answer #2 · answered by ixnaytim 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Looks like a waste of money. If you're losing balls switch to cheaper balls till your game improves.
I'd rather invest in a GPS unit for course management not ball finding!
2007-11-16 04:14:20 · answer #3 · answered by squintkid 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
HB, save your money on all of these gimmicks. If it did work you'd spend more time ball hawking than playing. Spend more time chipping and putting.
2007-11-16 06:39:58 · answer #4 · answered by toughnottobeacynic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please send me the money instead. I promise it will be well spent on Green -fees.
2007-11-16 06:50:59 · answer #5 · answered by pretzgolf 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
f
2007-11-16 04:08:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋