For PPL Who Consider Archaeological Proof Of Evolution A Conspiracy-Why Do You Believe So?

Question

As opposed to other conspiracies? Also, is it true many believe that these bones of prehistoric men & dinosaurs were planted by the "devil".

Paula K-Is that suppose to be directed at me? Who did I bash?

Answer 1

The only major question I have about evolution is - why haven't we evolved into something else by now? We've been "humans" for way too long!!!

***edit
I find it ironic that you specifically ASK for opinions opposite your own, and then bash us when you get one. Were you looking for an opportunity to argue, or did you really want our thoughts?

Answer 2

What archeological proof ? There are no transitional forms in the geolgic fossil record. The bones of dinosaurs and men only prove that they once lived and are now dead. No Christian believes that Satan planted any bones to deceive us . We do believe that the Devil planted the lie of evolution in man's heart to decieve him and therfore condemn him. In this way yes there is a conspiracy by Satan, and his servants to destroy men with this lie. Sadly even some Christians are deceived about this. Peter warns us that people will deny the creation as well as the flood. Paul warns us that even Christians will believe in fables....

2 Peter 3:3-7 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

2 Timothy 4:3-4 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

Answer 3

If one has a literal view of the bible, they must believe in scientific conspiracy to maintain belief. These beliefs are supported by outright lies, or misunderstandings of evolution as seen by the answers below.

Actually Anthony, Carbon dating has come a long way, and is the a very accurate form of dating now days.

Your answer is an example of how religious people are mislead by lies used to bolster an indefeasible position.

There are different kinds of humans that have evolved due to environment after so long. Did you ever wonder why there are short stocky people around the icy regions below the North Pole? Why are humans who live on the equator are mostly black, whether they live in Australia, Vanuatu, Africa or the Marshal Islands? These are all forms of human evolution that has occurred due to environment. The clues are all around us.

Edit-------

No Transitional forms in the geologic record??? Try looking up transitional fossils, we have found thousands of them. One really has to completely ignore archeology to make a statement like that.

Paul also teaches in 2 Timothy 2:11-16 that women should have no opinions and are only saved through childbirth. What does that have to do with this argument? It highlights that Paul isn't much of a moral role model to rely on when forming doctrine.

Quoting scripture might make one feel better, but doesn't support an argument when taken in context.

Answer 4

No one doubts that the bones are real. What people do not believe is the age assigned to them.
Are you aware of how bones are dated? You probable think some highly sophisticated radio-metric dating method is used. Well, I hope you are not disappointed, because that is not the case. Bones are dated by which geologic layer they are found in. The geologic column(c. 1830) has "assumed" date ranges for each layer. When a bone is excavated the only "archaeological proof" you have is that something died or was killed, and you found it in this location. If radio-metric dating methods are used, they must yield an age range that supports the assumed date range assigned to the layer in which it was found. If not- the data is discarded as faulty. The bottom line of prehistoric bone dates is that they are all assumed. And, there is no way to verify the age assumed.

Answer 5

No. The dating is unreliable and it has been proven after testing that many fossils were rubbed with chemicals and filed down to suit the needs of the evolutionists.

Atheist - That is simply your opinion based on the institutional lies that you have been told. What? You think that our history books tell the truth? Wake up! The evil people who have set up the curriculum for the public schools and catholic schools have been lying for decades upon decades.