Creation it is the only thing that can be proved and has been proved over and over but evolution has never been proven unless they use fake evolution. For the evolutionist out there explain the octopuses eye being less complex that the human even though they supposedly came millions of years before and explain the bombardier beetle how is it still here if it evolved from a cell it wouldn't be here because it would be extinct.
2007-11-15 14:00:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by smart1 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Creation
2007-11-15 14:05:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by realchurchhistorian 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I believe in the combination of the two.
Here's something to ponder over-- The Rh as in Human blood typing is in reference to the Rhesus Monkey. And the negative blood types do not combine with the Rhesus monkey enzyme.
Yet O- people can be universal donors.
Scientist cannot figure out where the negative blood type comes from.
O+ is the most dominate blood type on the planet in humans.
Also, if evolution was the only answer, then who wrote the DNA code? Evolution has not been proven, and if Darwin had known about DNA he would come to a different conclusion.
2007-11-15 14:25:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Scorpian S 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Creation, for Evolution I would need to have a greater faith than what I have in creation. Evolution is illogical. Imaging two Atoms floating in a immense vacuum that have no end. Again 2 tiny atoms floating and just like that out of chance they collided and big bang happened and from chaos this immense perfect timed universe was created, evolution began. Question what or who created these two Atoms?
2007-11-15 14:09:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Creation. It takes way more faith to believe in Evolution.
2007-11-15 14:04:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Evolution.
2007-11-15 13:54:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Alex H 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Evolution.
2007-11-15 13:54:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I believe in animal changing through the effects of 1) animal adaptations making them more specific to their environments as they microevolve, a wolf to dog for example 2) animals and plants changing as a result of the fall. Death entered the world when man sinned and drug the rest of the world including animals with himself AND 3) animals changing as a result of the climate changed between the world before the flood and after... and of course I believe in creation and a creationary orchard of various created animal types that microevolved somewat
2007-11-15 14:00:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
creation listen if we evolved from monkeys then why havent some of the monkeys evolved yet? like the ones at the zoo or just in the wild they havent turned into a humans? there is no proof at all!
2007-11-15 13:56:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Whopper 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
evolution is based on facts creation is not . I'll stick with evolution.
2007-11-15 13:55:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by dogpatch USA 7
·
3⤊
2⤋