English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-15 10:35:02 · 11 answers · asked by Franco G 1 in Consumer Electronics Games & Gear PlayStation

11 answers

if you have a really good Hi-Def TV they will almost look the same at their top performace.

Only differences are the shadows (360 is a little darker)


So money wise I'd suggest the 360. PS3 is way to pricey and does not have as much to offer compared to the 360.

2007-11-15 10:44:09 · answer #1 · answered by envader343 2 · 0 2

The PS3 has way better graphics than the 360. Think about it. 360 fanboys keep saying that the 360 graphics looks the same as the PS3, but developers have had more time to work with the 360 than they did with the PS3. But in that shorter amount of time, they've managed to make the PS3 graphics look the same as the 360, then in a year, the PS3 is going to look so much better.

2007-11-15 19:12:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You people still don't get it... The PS3 graphics will not be any better than the Xbox360 in the future because the Xbox360's GPU is far superior. The latter can do High Dynamic Range (HDR) all the way without speed penalties whereas the PS3's RSX falls down in performance if it wants to display HDR. So far the technicalities. So don't expect wonders from the PS3 but thats the fault of Sony bragging for too long. The main difference we can expect is that at image quality the Xbox360's games will be only better in the future because its power is only being discovered. And there is no excuse like the Xbox360 was one year earlier because the PS3's hardware was delayed 1 year only for waiting on the Blu-ray laser. So no advantage for the 360 on this front!

2007-11-18 23:08:38 · answer #3 · answered by Melvin W 1 · 0 0

looking at graphic wise PS3 and xbox 360 graphics are pretty much the same. if you look at most of the games that came out for both system(that came out before the summer) Thery may have looked better on 360 by a very small way. like lighting or shadow or frame rate ect. during the summer to like october it was the same. Now PS3 is better then the 360 in graphics. this is because devopers are getting used to the system and the way it work. The PS3 is only going to get better. and it only using like 20%- 30% of it power. imaging if it was at 99%. that would look like real life and 100% will make it perfectly real life,perfect lighting frame rate, ect. And it can happen in the next 4 years.It possible but PS3 right has better graphic and it only going to get better, xbox 360 is reaching it peak and PS3 will make the 360 graphic out date in the future and games on PS3 will be longer better faster and doing more things at once because of the disc space and engeneers have found a way to make the disc 100gb and more in the future.

2007-11-15 20:09:13 · answer #4 · answered by Perry 3 · 0 0

I've never seen a 360 and I already know that the PS3 has way more potential than the X.

Have you read the specs? Put it this way if the graphics are equivalent PS3 will surpass the 360 in just a short time.

2007-11-15 18:42:10 · answer #5 · answered by Jurrassikk 3 · 0 0

ps3 because bluray can hold up to 50gb of data so this allows developers to put extra data for better HD graphics(xbox only has 8.5gb) plus the graphics are similar now but ps3's potential is not even close to its full potential. take a look at uncharted drake's fortune, you will be amazed at the graphics and guess what, that game is only using 30% of ps3's potential. so think about that, and think how the games will look when it reaches 100% potential

theres no doubt that ps3 has or will have better graphics than 360

2007-11-15 19:47:48 · answer #6 · answered by BaSeBaLlKiD721 6 · 0 0

PS3 "exclusives" have better grpahics than Xbox 360 "exclusives".

Multi-platform games have basically the same graphics on both systems.

2007-11-15 20:11:22 · answer #7 · answered by Jeseth 5 · 0 0

hahaha.. i laugh at your question but not at you my friend.. the ps3 is wayy better.. thats why it is expensive.. it might cost more but when you look back in the future youll think yh it was worth it... ps3 is way better.. its close is some games but most the ps3 is better.. look at the pictures [__http://uk.gamespot.com/features/6162742/__] xbox is less realistic ... ps3 looks real.. its truly a thing of beauty.. i cant wait untill i get mine... if you look the xbox is too bright and the light fades everywhere and it looks like a game but the ps3 graphics are amazing..

2007-11-19 16:13:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is my cut and paste answer. The reason for that is because a tech info is a tech info, you can't beat it (sources below).

PS3 will win the console war, no doubt. Xbox 360 and Wii are so weak from technological point of view, that in couple of years they won't be capable of dealing with serious graphics. GTA IV, for instance, isn't even announced for Wii - this toy won't be able to cope with the game's requirements. Xbox 360 is getting GTA IV, however, the game is going to be released on several DVDs - Xbox 360 owners will have to interrupt gaming process and switch discs (Rockstar complained about this issue). Only PS3 will have it on single BD-DVD.

Let's compare PS3 and XBOX 360:

A third of XBOX 360 (33%) are malfunctioning right from the start. PS3 return rate is only around 0.2%. Despite some people say, that new 360 has no breakdown issues - just visit Xbox section of Yahoo answers and see for yourself an amount of complaints.

PS3 has 8 (7+1) kernels in Cell processor, Xbox 360 -only 3.
PS3 uses advanced tech called Blu-Ray, one disc can store up to 54 gb (in the future - up to 200 gb), Xbox 360 - regular dual layer DVD-9 (8.5GB). It's possible to get HD-DVD (max. - 30GB) for 360, but it'll cost you around 180$, in this case Xbox is going to be MUCH more expensive, than PS3.
Calculations per sec - PS3 - 51-billion-dot-product-operati... per second
Xbox 360 - 33.6-billion-dot-product-opera... per second
PS3 has full media support - USBs, built-in 4 slots card reader (except 20GB and 40GB versions), ability to use printer and so on.
Xbox 360 has USBs and only 2 memory slots.
PS3 supports up to 7 Bluetooth Controllers
Xbox 360 - up to 4 Controllers
PS3 - wi-fi included (except 20 gb version)
Xbox 360 - wi-fi will cost you around 100 $

Graphics are stronger in PS3, due to RSX chip, that was developed by Nvidia exclusively for PS3. RSX runs on 550 Mhz. It's difficult to compare their graphics chips, because 360 has a video chip with totally different structure and operating memory is divided differently in both consoles. However, PS3 exclusives look better than 360's exclusives.

PS3 uses technology from AGEIA company. It does to physics of the game same thing GPU (videocard processor) does to graphics. This thing is on sale for PC(special card). The price is around 350$. There is no such thing in 360.

Xbox 360 is widely known for so-called "red ring of death" problem - it gets overheated easily. My PS3 was running for more than 15 hours non-stop with no problems. Sometimes Xbox 360 becomes so overheated, that thermopaste on CPU melts, drips on motherboard and successfully shortcircuits it. That's why in some countries people call Xbox 360 "Coffin 360".

Besides all of this, I've seen disassembled Xbox 360 - regular PC architecture - Billy Gates is an uninventive nerd (as usual).
When I saw disassembled PS3 - it was a surprise - smart architecture, good cooling (don't buy external PS3 coolers - they make everything worse - original system is good), etc.

In 2008 PS3 will get more than 300 games, including Metal Gear Solid 4, The Agent and other great exclusives. Here is the good link to the future PS3 releases. http://ps3.ign.com/index/release.html......

PS3 online is free, Xbox 360 - you have to pay.

There were reports, that 360 scratches discs. No reports on that in PS3.

The funniest thing, that right now there are no games for PS3, that show full potential of the console. Biggest games weigh only 25 GB (Xbox 360 will need more than 3 discs even for those).

On PS3 you can install other OS, such as Linux Yellow Dog, Ubuntu and others. Sony officially lets you do it. There is no such thing in 360.

PS3 HDD can be replaced easily with any 2.5" SATA 5400 RPM HDD (used in laptops). 250 GB will cost you around 170$. In 360 you have to buy exclusive HDD, where 20GB will cost you 100$.

Sony expects PS3 to stay on the market for, at least, 7-10 years. Also Sony reduces price now. There is a cheaper 40GB version of PS3.

Sony constantly upgrades PS3 software (free updates for OS) - you get new functions and improvements.

PS3 controller (sixaxis) has a motion control - you move controller - game responds. Wii has it, Xbox 360 - doesn't. PS3 is getting rumble controller (Dualshock 3) in 1st quarter 2008, Japan gets it in this November.

On PS3 you can help sick people by running Folding Home project. Wii and Xbox 360 didn't even think about it.

New 40GB is 399$ or 399 euro (depends on the region) - it has no backwards compatibility with PS2 games, has 2 USBs instead of 4, no built-in card reader, but it's the same PS3, strong, reliable, less noisy, different cooling system. The price is friendly.

I didn't mention Wii, because it's so weak, no point to talk about it. Leave it for kindergarten and casual games.

www.teamxbox.com
www.kotaku.com
www.qj.net
www.ign.com
www.wikipedia.org
www.newegg.com
www.ps3fanboy.com and many other sources.

2007-11-16 04:35:46 · answer #9 · answered by Bull Goose Loony 7 · 0 0

ps3 all the way

2007-11-15 18:50:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers