Why is there so little evidence that Jesus actually existed?

Question

Seems like there'd be more evidence, doesn't it?

Answer 1

You would think, but it was a long time ago. I don't worry about it much one way or the other. If Jesus was real, he wasn't the son of god.

Answer 2

There's some evidence that Jesus existed, but absolutely NO evidence that he was anything more than a mortal man. The reality is that Jesus was a charismatic politician. A liberal (for the time) radical politician in world governed by Kings. He used old-testament religion to draw the masses of peasants together under a unified "vision" and 'led his people to freedom'. Giving him god-like status (as the 'Son of God') is a little much, don'tcha think? All he did was spread a message about eternal salvation that sounded much much better than a pointless life of servitude and slavery. In the end, his political opponents feared the grassroots popularity of his message (that there is someone more important to serve than your King here on Earth and you should be willing to fight and die for the freedom to serve God) - and they made an example of him.

Duh!

Answer 3

Because he wasn't important until after he died.

He was a poor carpenter who hung with degenerates. He started up a mini-revolution calling the Rabbis hypocrites and charlatans, they tacked him to a cross.

During his time, John the Baptist had his name on everyone's lips. Jesus was very, very minor in impact on a grand scale, but had a grand impact on a small number of people.

Those people spread the word. Most great artists never sell a painting while alive... it's no different with Jesus. He didn't have a lot of money, he was just a poor man with a big mouth as far as the general population is concerned.

It's not blasphemy to state it as it is, people are people. Jesus was important after the fact, otherwise we'd have his teenage years, details on his family, exact locations and everything else. He had ZERO impact on Judaism.

Someone starts roaming around, "My way is the way". The fundies (at the time) decided to make an example of him and it backfired over the next few centuries.

Answer 4

To the person who said the bible is evidence that jesus existed...i laugh in your face lol

There is no evidence. This is why there is a never ending debate between religions!

The bible is just a book, just like the millions of other books we have in this world lol

Answer 5

Jesus was not a king or a Pharaoh having castles and building statues and monuments for himself, this is one of the main reasons, you have very little evidence. Another reason is that the Jewish who where the rulers in Israel at that time and the priests hated Jesus so they could have also helped in hiding any evidence about him.

Answer 6

Iamjacks.... has pretty well summarized it. I do not know a lot of thinking people that question the actual existence of the man Jesus. He wasn't a writer or a scholar or a government official, so records about him should be expected to be scant.

Answer 7

the only convincing argument that i'm conscious of is a scriptural one. the assumption is that in case you study the parables attributed to Jesus, you hit upon a definite continuity of trend, topic, undertaking count, etc. that shows all of them come from a single author/composer. Granted, they have been edited to slant interior the direction that the gospel author demanded, yet of their difficulty-loose style, they seem to come again from a single individual. That individual might have been a Galilean rabbi named Jesus/Yeshua. it is approximately as close as you're in all likelihood to get to historic (textual) information. EDIT: related to the idiotic remark approximately Socrates with the aid of the moron under, Plato isn't the only source we've approximately Socrates. yet another of his scholars additionally wrote approximately him: Xenophon. additionally, Aristophanes references Socrates and his conduct in a play, which Socrates felt exchange into no longer an precise portrayal. additionally, there are the Athenian militia information. you spot, Socrates had a value and completed heroically interior the Peloponnese wars. additionally, there have been present day inscriptions and busts. there is extremely extra information for the existence of Socrates than for Jesus, and easily an sick-recommended dolt might declare in any different case.

Answer 8

Many traced his steps according to the Bible and investigated, and found plenty evidence to prove that the reports in the Bible about Jesus' existence is true.

I believe he is real but to you and others who need more proof than what is reported in the Bible, like Thomas will have to seek it.

Answer 9

There's tons of evidence that Jesus existed, the problem is, none of it is credible.

Every aspect of Jesus in the NT is mythical. It isn't valid historical exegesis to throw 98% of it away and claim that whatever is left is historical. It was common in those days to inflate historical figures with a bit of legend, but Jesus is ALL legend. Where's the beef?

Beware of arguments such as 'most historians agree Jesus existed', because most historians are Christians. They are not unbiased on this subject.

Everyone from Josephus on provide only evidence that Christianity existed, not that Jesus existed.

Answer 10

There's not much evidence left of a lunch I had three months ago, either. A lot of things can change in 2000 years.

Answer 11

There isn't a lot of evidence of a lot of things from 2000 years ago.