English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

do you think its okay to suck apart a tiny little unborn baby if the parents are too selfish,

or

are you against murdur? (no abortions)

2007-11-15 09:43:38 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

im agaianst 101%

2007-11-15 09:44:15 · update #1

someone will take care of them. a lot of people who CANNOT have kids would love to have adopt one.

you wouldnt kill a kid at an orphanage, would you?

2007-11-15 09:54:07 · update #2

you talk about the womans rights? what about the baby's? it cant speak at that young, but if it could, it wouldnt want to be aborted.

2007-11-15 09:59:12 · update #3

WOW.

edit *murdEr*
edit *against*

2007-11-15 10:07:23 · update #4

30 answers

Against 100%.

I often wonder why pro-choice people say "I don't care what a woman because it's her body". Hmm..and what about the body of the child she is aborting?

Others say "it's not a baby". Good one. If it's not a baby--why does it need to be aborted?

I don't understand how any human could tolerate the killing of unborn children. People say "Well you're only pro-life because you're a Christian and the Bible says it's wrong". Ha. I'd be against it whether I was Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, or atheist. Doesn't matter what religion I am--I'm human.

2007-11-15 09:52:13 · answer #1 · answered by adrian♥ 6 · 5 9

Don't tell me what I can do with my body and I won't but my nose in yours. It is up to the person who is making decisions about their body I am not for or against. But then again those who know better than GOD and believe they should take on the next persons relationship with GOD can make every ones choices. I wish they would say my prayers for me too since they know better than me. Oh by the way I grew up in foster homes and group homes. Because I had parents who had children and did not care for them. As a matter of fact my sister when I was 8 years old and she was 13 my mother married her off to a man from Saudi Arabia. She was wise enough at the time to get the hell out of the terrible situation our family was in. I happen to be lucky enough to go to some decent foster homes and other which were their to abuse and use kids. So even those who have adopted and those who have been foster parents have harmed children. So this is why I am getting my Social Work degree to help women and children who have difficult lives and choices to make remember it is choices NOT WHAT I TELL YOU WHAT TO DO.

2007-11-16 00:49:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If there had been more time, I could have changed my mind.
I could have stood up for my child instead of being so blind!
If there had been more time, I could have thought it out
Now I sit here alone, with fear, anger, guilt and doubt.

I want to be rescued, forgiven and set free
but the decision alone rested solely on me.

If there had been more time, he could have lived more
but I prevented him from growing when I walked through that door.
If there had been more time, he could have been born,
but the choice that I made left him tattered and torn.

I want to be rescued, forgiven and set free
but the decision alone rested solely on me.

If there had been more time, I wouldn't feel so bad
I'm beginning to think that I had been Had
I wasn't told the truth most of it was lies
and my child had to suffer with only silent cries.

I want to be rescued, forgiven and set free
but the decision alone rested solely on me.

Now the time is gone there isn't any more
I chose to do something I hadn't thought of before.
My baby is gone because I was given a choice
now I'll never have a chance to hear his sweet little voice.

I had an abortion, and although I thought I was doing the right thing, it has left scars so deep in my heart that I may never heal. I am pro-choice, but the decision was not right for me!

2007-11-16 14:01:29 · answer #3 · answered by stacielb06 3 · 0 0

You don't need to be 'pro-abortion' to be 'pro-choice'.
The societal ramifications of making abortions illegal is by far the worse alternative.

Interestingly enough. Abortions have dropped significantly in the US since it was made legal. Also interesting is that while the abortion rate fell significantly under the Clinton administration, it has rising quite a bit under the Bush administration. Also, Evangelical Christians have one of the highest abortion rates of any religious group. In countries where religion is the minority (europe, scandanavia) the abortion rate is half of what it is in the US.

So- empirical data would indicate that if you want to reduce the number of abortions, making it illegal is the wrong choice. however, if you are religious- you tend not to look at empirical data.

2007-11-15 18:06:50 · answer #4 · answered by Morey000 7 · 3 1

I support a woman's right to choose....100%

I do find it ironic that you'll never come across a person who is pro-choice who tells someone who wants to have a baby that they can't...

But...looking on the flip side of that coin...

You get my point...hopefully.....

EDIT: Your reasoning to support your case is weak. If there are truly so many people out there who want to adopt children, why does the USA still have a Foster Care system? Why are children continuing to be abused in the foster care system? I know a woman who had 4 children, and all of them got taken away and put in foster care. 4 different homes. Every single one of those children were abused in the foster care system.

The fact of the matter is....if the pro-life movement was so willing to put their pro-life money where their pro-life mouths were...there'd be no Foster Care agency, there'd be no orphanages, there'd be none of that....because every pro-life household would have multiple adopted babies, which they saved from abortion. Fact of the matter is...this isn/'t happening. So, until it does....you need to fix the problem on YOUR end...not the other way round.

And to the first person who answered this question....You may be pro-life, but you have my utmost respect......

2007-11-15 17:52:47 · answer #5 · answered by Adam G 6 · 9 2

I'm against abortions for myself, although there are some cirumstances in which it could be conceived as the right decision.
I was advised to have an abortion with my fourth, because it was a high risk pregnancy, due to the fact I'd just had a cezarian with my third!

2007-11-15 17:59:43 · answer #6 · answered by Watsit 5 · 0 2

First of all, it's very hard to take you seriously when you can't even spell the word murder. I'm pro-choice. So that means if a woman wants to have an abortion, and she does it legally then I will not judge or look down on her for it.

2007-11-15 18:06:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Hmm... rather one sided question.

I'm in favor of a woman's right to choose and against some religious jackass dictating what a woman can and can't do with her body because it offends a mythological sky-fairy.



Re: additional details
I would not kill an orphan; nor would I kill an abortion doctor. They are viable people. Pre-viability fetuses are not. What is so difficult about the concept?

Re: more additional details
It can't talk largely because it is a fetus. A sperm cell can't talk either, yet one is not imprisoned for spilling some in places other than a vagina. And how do you have any idea what is being thought by something that does not have brain activity? Or a brain?

2007-11-15 17:47:56 · answer #8 · answered by Blackacre 7 · 15 3

I find it wrong that so many babies are born unwanted and have to grow up with abuse and neglect.

What kind of a life is a kid going to have when their parents only kept them because they were forced to?


Edit: I worked at a childrens shelter for years.
They were almost never adopted, and when they were the circumstances were almost always worse than before they left. Most of the children I cared for will carry scars for the rest of their life from the physical and mental abuse their parents put them through.

Also, my sisters were adopted from china, All 3 of them were abandoned and left in shopping centers and alleyways. They were lucky, unfortunatley a good number of kids in similar scenarios die in china every day.

Better in my book to terminate a cluster of cells then to leave a baby to die in the streets.

In an ideal world every child would be wanted and cared for....this is not that world.
Pro Choice

2007-11-15 17:50:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 9 3

Good job being impartial in your question. I'm pro-choice. It is my opinion that an unborn child does not have the same rights as a fully formed human being, and that banning abortions would greatly affect the already high natural increase rate all over the world.

2007-11-15 17:49:24 · answer #10 · answered by Jonathan 3 · 6 3

I'm against it except in cases of rape and/or incest. Otherwise it is senseless and it's murder. There's other options out there, abstinence, condoms, etc. Also giving the baby up for adoption to a loving family is also something to consider. I believe that a society that accepts abortion as OK is also a society that cultivates death. Just my views on this.

I believe in God, but I'm also not religious. Pro-Life.

2007-11-15 17:54:10 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers