http://www.urbantulsa.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=18388
This is kind of funny.
The bottom line is the court wouldn't enjoin against the law being enforced. However, the write up is better than that.
2007-11-15 07:21:49 · 6 answers · asked by DAR 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
FYI - you have a clone on the boards posing as you. I've seen a couple of answers now that aren't you, for sure.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ap2SNQKPV3XIf4FrFF2sK6ja7BR.;_ylv=3?qid=20071115172459AA6BpSV
Edit: He keeps switching the name in and out, it may or may not show when you go to look. You'll see the reference in the question. I just wanted you to know in case you start seeing weird stuff, or getting strange comments.
2007-11-15 12:37:44 · answer #1 · answered by steddy voter 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Each time a state law is shot down in federal court, follow on attempts are adjusted to compensate. Oklahoma may have the model for all state laws. I hope so.
2007-11-15 08:04:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
These are just the opening salvos. While it's remarkable for a law like this to even go into effect, it's still virtually certain to be struck down in the courts, once the legions of pro-illegal lawyers (no irony there) drag it into the federal system.
2007-11-15 07:49:31 · answer #3 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree with the author. Since this was dismissed based on a lack of merit to sustain a win, this law will remain in effect.
Score 1 for the good guys.
2007-11-15 07:44:17 · answer #4 · answered by chuck_junior 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Excellent.
2007-11-15 07:27:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Justice for the moment has been served
2007-11-15 07:34:45 · answer #6 · answered by jean 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋