That would be the shortest attack in the history of the world.
The USA has the absolute right to secure our borders.
2007-11-15 03:44:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by chuck_junior 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Protecting a nations sovereignty and enforcing it's laws is hardly harassment. If they were legal and abiding by the law there wouldn't be a problem would there? If anyone has the right to complain America does, for the illegal invasion of millions of people, many of which are serious criminals.....not to mention the public statements and posters sighting their intentions of taking over this country. I can guarantee you Mexico wouldn't tolerate it happening to them. Their president and past president have out right admitted they encourage it and don't have any intention to try and curb the invasion, or assist in any way.
Do you even know what a sanction is? Then attack us? Bring it on. I for one am sick and tired of acting like this all just a handful of poor people wanting to pick tomatoes that are all nice and sweet and good people. Far from it.
2007-11-15 11:08:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
OK...I'll bite on your troll bait...
Yes...Mexico should go to the U.N to try to place sancation(sic) on the U.S for harassing mexicans(sic)!!
Right after...
The United States and Canada have similar sanctions imposed on Mexico for knowingly and willfully undermining their sovereignty.
The last thing that the heavily indebted, ineffective and STILL largely corrupt government on Mexico needs is a military confrontation. It would take hundreds of years for Mexico to rebuild the infrastructure that the US would decimate in the first 30 minutes of battle.
With respect to Chris Bridges...that's Ludicrous!
2007-11-15 11:38:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by widewillie 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
And what would that resolution be? People, not only Mexicans, cross that border every day. People from other countries sneak across both the Mexican and Canadian borders. People from the all the Central American countries as well as South American countries, the middle east, asian countries, and numerous other places from around the world.
I sympathize with the Mexican illegal immigrants that have been here for more than 5 yrs and with those that have paid taxes, have no criminal record, live right by our country, and pay their debts, and take care of their families. These are the type of people we want here. But to force another country to take on anothers burdens without straightening out their own is wrong and dangerous for that country who is taking them in. There is a solution to the illegal immigrant problem with the Hispanic population but until the war is over and we quit helping other nations with their problems we will never be able to take care of our own.
Blessed be and Peace to you
I guess no one else understood my answer about being against the UN resolution thing with 2 thumbs down. Sorry, I must have to make it easier for people to understand and speak s l o w l y. Not for UN to make us accept resolution, must make Mexico and all Central American countries to be self sufficient.
My red neck version ............ Build the wall, shoot on site, no more trade with MEXICO.
Is this what you all want to hear? That is what all I hear every day but no true solutions or suggestions that will be plausible for the end result to be beneficial to all parties. Ooops, sorry everyone, I used big words again.
2007-11-15 11:00:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Karma of the Poodle 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes, this is a great idea. I would love to see mexico standing up in the U.N. denouncing America for enforcing the law. We all know how battle hardened the "mexican military" is, they would clean up America the way they cleaned up mexico right?
2007-11-15 12:04:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by joeandhisguitar 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Sure, let them. The US has Veto power, and this would be a first, CHina and Russia would support us completely on this issue. The French Governmetn would be very sympathetic, and it would be a toss up with the ENglish, but they rarely defy us. The entire permanent members of the Security council have problems with illegal immigrants. All of them are getting strict in fighting illegal immigrants. You think the UN would listen to the ridiculous claim of Mexico.
2007-11-15 12:44:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If that is the case, can the US go the UN to protest Mexican military helping drug runners cross the border illegaly? Or go to the UN about the deplorable human rights violations that occur in the border towns of Mexico? Or go to the UN about how Mexico treats illegal immigrants in their country? Just sayings is all.
2007-11-15 11:04:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bring it on, then the USA will finally have a worldwide stage in which to show Mexico failure to provide for it's own citizens, even when Mexico has great wealth and resources, and they all but give their poverty driven citizens a bus ticket. They were giving them comic books hand outs, to show then the way and how to avoid being capture
2007-11-15 10:58:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by jean 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
If wouldn't matter. The United States would reject anything that came from the UN that tried to say what we should do concerning our borders. Not to mention there are too many countries who are not about to take Mexico's side over the US.
2007-11-15 10:57:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by First & Ten 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
What the HECK are you talking about. We are not "harassing" mexicans, we are trying to FORCE ILLEGAL INVADERS to follow our laws. American already has enough against Mexico to attack it! they refuse to control their citizens, they even promote ways on how to get across the border ILLEGALLY.
The UN is a joke anyway.
2007-11-15 14:04:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋