so tey aren't mixed with the guys. they should fight but not endanger the guys lives.
2007-11-15 01:37:23 · 9 answers · asked by 8lboreck 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The whole unit would be down 5 days a month
2007-11-15 01:41:08 · answer #1 · answered by booman17 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
The number of men out way the number of woman so I am unsure if there are even any "all" female units in any branch of the military. Just for the record in our combatives training I have put a few men on their ***. With so many people that are crying that they don't want to go to war, to keep the woman out of the military that want to be here is just stupid. As I sit here today and collect the many benfits and my paycheck for being in the military, I am glad not everyone still has prejudged notions of what we are capable of by opinion. The entire millitary is filled with an array of jobs not all needing phsical strength. So letting our men die all the time when there are woman like me who would give her life as well slip away makes no sense. I gladly serve my country everyday. I love serving with my brothers and I know they don't mind having woman around to look at every now and again with these 15 month deployments.
2007-11-15 10:09:42 · answer #2 · answered by niki 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a women who served during war, the thing was my whole unit was a print operation in PSYOPS, so we were not on the front lines, our presses would get blown up...LOL, our job was to print leafglets and litter the countryside with them. My husbands unit also has women in it, but they run radio and a radio station, again they are not on the front line, the 82nd and green bareys who are, do not have women. There were some units that had women in kuwaite were I was and they were kneee deep in the sand with the men (MP unit) for six months.
2007-11-15 10:53:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It smacks of discrimination. Both against the guys and against the gals. There would be charges that the unit is being treated preferentially. The only way to make it equal is for them to serve along side of men.
2007-11-15 09:46:44 · answer #4 · answered by scottclear 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well in my opinion, and personal belief, I think women is just as capable as men should be if they are the best. I mean, if they can run and aim, why not? but i think that the women arent sent becuase they could slow down the unit (not trying to be sexist here). They suppose men are more durable and braver in combat. But like i said, if the womens go the guts and strength, put them in. They might be better then some men on the unit.
2007-11-15 09:45:26 · answer #5 · answered by capt.whooligan 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Women don't commonly serve on the battlefield not because of "inferiority", but because men have it naturally programed into them to protect women, so they tend to do stupid things to impress or protect a woman. Women can perform just as good as men in physical fitness.
2007-11-15 10:55:35 · answer #6 · answered by Todd 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
1. Women shouldn't be in the military (their testosterone level is 1/10 of men's and they have 70% of a mens strenght at best. You ever seen a female basket ball player being even half as good as a male?)
2. The US military should not be allowed to operate outside the USA.
3. Where the Government in general should have a mix of 50/50 women to men.
2007-11-15 09:45:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
"they should fight but not endanger the guys lives."
feeling a little sexist today ?
2007-11-15 09:40:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because the female body is physically weaker than the male body
2007-11-15 09:40:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋