English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Since we have accurate records going back 10,000 years I would say "NO"

2007-11-15 01:31:37 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment Global Warming

15 answers

lol...I've been saying the same thing for sooooo long....

2007-11-15 01:34:00 · answer #1 · answered by 81 Honda 5 · 2 2

That depends on the interval you use and where you select the data to be measured.

You can say that it's warming faster during the last 10 years than the at any time over the last 100 years.

You can say that between 2am and 3 am the climate didn't change.

It all depends on how you choose your data. While 1 hour isn't enough time in the history of the planet to draw any conclusions, neither is 10 years or 100 years. All these times are not even an eye blink in the history of the Earth.

2007-11-15 10:18:26 · answer #2 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 0 3

we do have some accurate records..they have been doing core samples in Antartica, there are some other sorts of tests, like in tree samples and in rocks...there is evidence to support that we are approaching a natural earth changing process that will effect the weather same way...

BUT...I think that it is very responsible that we continue to protect the earth..because Global warming weather relavent or not to right now could happen. nature needs a certain balance to be able to support life. What do you think will happen when all the tree's are gone? you won't be able to breathe..

plus we are also learning a lot by becoming more responsible...we are learning more about natural energy..this world must evolve from the current age of energy.

2007-11-15 09:41:23 · answer #3 · answered by ✿❃❀❁✾ Stef ♐ ✿❃❀❁✾ 7 · 3 2

I wish that they would read some history books. I was in school back in the 1950s and we learned that the climate has been changing since the beginning of time. The global warming folks appear to be afraid of any kind of change.

2007-11-15 09:40:05 · answer #4 · answered by John 6 · 3 2

Yeah, for 400+ million years... when it was 80-110 degrees every day in North America... and the dinosaurs lived in swamps that looked like the Lousiana bayou from NYC to Los Angeles.

The inconvenient truth, is that we've been colder than is usual -- if you can use that term for a planet that's been covered in ice (4-5x that we know of), covered in molten magma, covered in water, and been slammed into by another planet (which is where the moon comes from). And of course, polarity & the north/south poles switched & flipped this planet so often -- that more eruptions took place, and violently moved plates/continents in ways we CANNOT even understand, even when KNOWING that South America & Africa used to be together AND that India used to be part of Africa and went sailing & crashing into Asia, to point of pushing up the Himalayas.

Facts are -- people make the air unHEALTHY for other people, like spewing benzene into the air EVERY night and every cloudy day (to the ignorance of MEDIA, and every politician that would simply point to Big Oil... about co2?). Some sincere-on-camera talking head like Al Gore can make money being himself in a movie (which is a PRODUCT people)... and in it, ignore his 8 years in the WHITE HOUSE??? (Nafta, mega-SUVs for soccer moms, eliminating Fed. Hwgy MPG standards!!) by glossing over those 8 years in 2 SECONDS in that movie? and nary anyone says a peep about that?

CANCER is the issue. And if the Nobel people were really noble, they'd have seen through the fog of a silly documentary designed to catch the same money-train that Michael Moore rode... by targeting the same niche of smarter-than-you Democrats and people easily fooled by fear (and collectively, that hate Big Business & George Bush). BENZENE. Period.

2007-11-15 09:35:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

There's a big difference between the (usually) slow natural change and what is going on now. The only rapid change we know much about is the rapid cooling at the end of the Cretaceous. Ask your dinosaur friends about that. Oh, wait, there aren't any more.

2007-11-15 09:48:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

We humans are full of hubris. The planet doesn't care what we do or whether we survive. It warms it cools it goes on. We may or may not. The fact the planet may be warming or cooling at any given time is not the issue. It is whether it is caused by mankind or whether mankind is capable of doing anything about it. I think not in both cases.

2007-11-15 09:41:37 · answer #7 · answered by Fafeom 3 · 3 1

.global warmer's are idiots but there the type that get into forums where they can influence other idiots. Al Gore for example and they gave him the Nobel Peace Prize for cryin out loud

2007-11-15 09:38:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

yes like right fuc*ing now..they say it changes on degree in 100 years, not many of us will live to see it change now well we.. so dont freakin worry bout it. that p*sses me off why people sit and talk and worry about stupid Sh*t.

2007-11-15 09:36:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

i think the whole global warming thing is getting blown out of proportion.
the earth is always changing, and we can evolve and adapt to the changes.
people need to stop spazzin out about it.

2007-11-15 09:36:48 · answer #10 · answered by kitsune_rose_chan 2 · 4 1

in the ice age

2007-11-15 18:17:33 · answer #11 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers