Intelligent design vrs evelution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_Design
2007-11-15 00:58:08 · 13 answers · asked by Lamont Eddy 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No PBS is evil and did not show any crocoducks.
2007-11-15 01:00:40 · answer #1 · answered by Potatoe Plague 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Yes. The ID / Creationists ("cdesign proponentsists") lost a case in front of a Bush-appointed Federal judge when the burden of proof was on the opposition. Not only did they lose, but a pattern of deception was elucidated that shows that there is no moral high ground to their position. The Creationist school board members, through their intentional wrongdoings, cost a small school district over $1,000,000. It is clear that they were derelict in their fiduciary responsibilities in office. In summary, Creationists (relabeled ID) are immoral and untrustworthy.
2007-11-15 04:19:48 · answer #2 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
for those who would like to think we came frome apes consider this. the computer you are using no doutbt had a team of people designing it over many months. the home you live in was designed by some one even the chair you are sitting in had a designer. dont you think it is reasonable to conclude that as complicated as the human body is, and scientists still dont fully understand the compexity of the human brain or how it functions, that we had a designer? it is ludicris to think that some thing came from nothing
2007-11-15 01:17:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did and recorded it. An excellent program. One thing i noticed and I'm not sure if anyone else did. But the the preacher that "prayed" for the $1100 only wrote a check for $800. Where did the rest go? He said he put it in his personal checking account. Add embezzlement to his crime of perjury.
Lakley You are a complete IDIOT they proved conclusively that Darwin is correct!
2007-11-15 01:14:20 · answer #4 · answered by gdc 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought it was very good and should put an end to the Intelligent Design controversy. ID is not science.
2007-11-15 01:03:20 · answer #5 · answered by typre50 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I saw it and I expected more. I am not a fundamentalist, so I didn't mind their point of view, but I was a bit disappointed that they did infer that Darwin's science is correct...
I don't think either side has made what I would call a scientifically proven argument. Darwin's theory does have some pretty serious flaws.
2007-11-15 01:06:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I missed it, but given that ID has no evidence there could be only one conclusion.
If public schools were to teach it as an alternate theory, I'd have to have some serious conversations with the administration.
2007-11-15 01:05:14 · answer #7 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Saw it, recorded it. Excellent program. I'll never forget Judge Jones' characterization of the ID (defendants) as "Breath taking inanity!"
2007-11-15 01:02:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes, I also had a class in college that refuted the theory of intelligent design.
2007-11-15 01:01:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
you mean on nova?
it was ruled "not science"
"cdesign proponentsists" is the missing link between creationism, and Intelligent Design
here ya go reverend
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/
2007-11-15 01:00:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I wish I had -- but I stopped watching television years ago, just on general principle.
Maybe they'll release the show on DVD....
2007-11-15 01:01:33 · answer #11 · answered by The Reverend Soleil 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋