Why is he not doing anything to fight them n*****(sarcasm) in Sudan and to free the people? where is your hero now ?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071115/wl_afp/sudandiplomacydarfurun
2007-11-14 20:42:34 · 11 answers · asked by 2012 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
liberalosman : your grammar and spelling is shameful.
2007-11-14 20:57:46 · update #1
Home School: If that were the case then why are we fighting a war in Afghanistan and Iraq? doesn't that equate to two wars? maybe i'm wrong here.
2007-11-14 21:39:38 · update #2
He's on vacation...again.
2007-11-14 20:46:43 · answer #1 · answered by PS Drummer 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
GEORGE W. BUSH is a hero! He should declare war on China, on the insurgency in Iraq, bomb (nuke) Iran, an evil nation, and work with NATO to contain Russia. All of the above and North Korea are part of Bush's axis of evil that he plans to get rid of. The Honorable George W. Bush said that he is doing this to protect our nation. His supporters believe this, so why don't the liberals?
If Bush doesn't declare martial law, which he should do, then either Hillary or Rudy will carry out the Bush agenda on Iraq and the rest of the world.
Bush supporters have nothing to fear as they have a friend in Hillary and Rudy! Life is assured!
President Bush is the good guy and China, Russia, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, and Russia are the bad guys. What's good or bad about Bush's reasoning and why is everyone buying into this scheme?
Bush (the Bush agenda) is unstoppable!
.
2007-11-15 01:29:10 · answer #2 · answered by peacenegotiator 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One war at a time. It lets the other nations see what the Might of the USA can accomplish. If they see a string of defeats, they are less likely to misbehave. Why pick more than one war at a time? If you try to fight on too many fronts, you will eventually lose. After 9/11 George bush made this statement. I thougth at the time it was the most significant sentence int he whole speach. Those who harbor and fund terrorism are just as guilty as the terrorists themselves.
2007-11-14 21:24:52 · answer #3 · answered by Homeschool produces winners 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is amusing mostly because if the President ever attempted to go into Sudan, youd probably be yelling the most at him to not.
2007-11-14 22:08:55 · answer #4 · answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question is practically a satire of what I can't stand about the Liberal mentality. Everything is negative and sarcastic. America is never right.
If we intervened, we shouldn't have.
If we should have intervened, we took too long.
We sent too many troops. We didn't send enough troops.
We should be doing more to help oppressed people. We should stay out of other peoples' business.
Can't you Liberals ever make up your mind? Do you even understand the term "coherent, cohesive philosophy"? Or are Liberals satisfied with just spastically jumping from one feel-good idea to the next?
2007-11-14 20:52:05 · answer #5 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Why didn't liberal superhero Bill Clinton do anything about the situation. The genocide in Sudan is hardly new.
Is it because the victims in this case are Christians?
Where was your hero then?
2007-11-14 20:48:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
simple. he is taken up with the hurculean task of attempting to muzzle nancy pelosi so that WORKING americans can solve the threat of al qaeda. its proven much more daunting than estimated.
2007-11-14 22:35:57 · answer #7 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
George Walter is full of mensh.
2007-11-14 21:10:22 · answer #8 · answered by emilia d 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
his hands are bound in iraq. world does,nt understand his mission. already his strike on iraq was,nt well recieved in ignorant muslim world. now if he invades another muslim country, there would be huge uproar while it is necessary to save suffering people of darfur.
2007-11-14 20:50:24 · answer #9 · answered by Alex Mahone 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
He needs rest
2007-11-14 20:45:50 · answer #10 · answered by Shary 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋