I saw the Kim Kardashian Playboy issue and Playboy really sucks. It is full of adds and articles on, Who knows. I think that actual issue only had like 2 layouts of women in it. That is crap!
2007-11-14 16:44:20 · 12 answers · asked by vwsurferjojo 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Magazines
You should so complain, if play boy gets enough complains something will be done!
2007-11-14 16:47:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Playboy Celebrity Layouts
2016-11-13 00:17:48 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Playboy has always had more articles than photos. Although now and again you get a celebrity layout that is quite revealing. The July 2007 expose on The Erotic Review was very revealing. And where else will you find pictures of beautiful women paired with quality fiction and news-of-the-day commentary in one magazine?
No, Playboy does not suck.
2007-11-16 18:08:56 · answer #3 · answered by qm2.matt 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Playboy magazine has been going downhill because they concentrate so hard on the electronic side of things. They have the Cyber Club, which keeps raising prices (from $9.99/month at the start to $24.99 now) and removing services (Cyber club chats cut to two a month is an example). Plus, they have good business with the NSS (Newstand Specials) which continue to get poorer as well.
2007-11-15 06:37:23 · answer #4 · answered by Jack R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most magazines are full of ads and articles and interviews. Playboy is no exception. If you want more pictures then you need to switch to Hustler or one of the other magazines that are more about the photos than anything else.
2007-11-15 00:02:51 · answer #5 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It s really boring now. The playmates are boney and not attractive. They look like heoin addicts.The printing is awful,blurry. Playboy used to have glossy high quality nudes.
2016-12-27 04:48:57 · answer #6 · answered by dave 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Playboy are more "gentlemen" side if you know what I mean, if you dont like Playboy just go online and watch porn ~_~
2007-11-14 16:48:03 · answer #7 · answered by gunslingerroses 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer my women a little more realistic. Playboy airbrushes them to the point that they are almost alien.
2007-11-14 16:48:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I know!! I'd rather have my magazines showing lots & lots of photos of naked beeotches. And I mean from all angles. Maybe a few poses from behind, cheeks spread showing her terd cutter, maybe a few poses from underneath showing her cooter with her meat curtains spread open. I could go on & on. I'll start a petition in my town. You should do the same.
2007-11-15 06:54:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because its not a "pornographic" magazine. Its "erotica". Its not necessarily meant to be masturbating material. It has a balance of what they think their readers want. Not just interesting articles and not just beautiful women, but a mix of both.
2007-11-14 16:53:29 · answer #10 · answered by Jack 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
playboy sucks because I'm not in it
2007-11-15 08:54:33 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋