Okay, so I'm an aspiring recording artist, and I want to have a specific trademark. I'M NOT A NAZI FOR GOD'S SAKE! I'm an East Indian Hindu, and I'm very upset that those Nazi's took my heritage away from me. Those Nazis call themselves "aryans" while I'm the real Aryan! I'm not racist or anything, and the swastica in my religion isn't a white supremacist sign! It's a sign of peace and unity crap whatever it is. All I know, is that it means well. So, if a swastica was my trademark, would the mainstream world accept that? I personally hate mainstream music, but I can't chose the kind of people who'd like my music. My music is a mix of electronica and rock (even though I don't believe in musical genres).
BUT if I put the swastika on my album cover AND an aum, would it be less of a contreversy?
2007-11-14 13:15:37 · 6 answers · asked by Addicted To Abercrombie & Fitch 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Anyways, it's impossible for an East Indian Hindu to be a Nazi.
2007-11-14 13:16:08 · update #1
East Indian Hindus are not Aryans.
2007-11-14 13:22:11 · answer #1 · answered by Max 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You need to find a different trademark. No matter what it means to you, your album would be banned in Germany, and the mainstream world wouldn't like it as a whole.
2007-11-14 13:20:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
almost anything that has to do with a swastika will become a controversy no matter what.
2007-11-14 13:24:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
unless you are prepared for a national uprising from the jews just skip it.
2007-11-14 13:19:35 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
yeah i wouldn't. pick something less.... potentially disastrous.
2007-11-14 13:22:30 · answer #5 · answered by The Reginald Kipper Herring 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
you wont be able to use it.
2007-11-14 13:20:25 · answer #6 · answered by Scotlyn 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋