Violence against women has been compared to a Holocaust -
http://www.digitalnpq.org/archive/2006_spring/21_ali.html
excerpt:
Between 113 million and 200 million women around the world are demographically “missing.” Every year, between 1.5 and 3 million women and girls lose their lives as a result of gender-based violence or neglect. As The Economist, which reported on the DCAF paper, put it last November, “Every two to four years the world looks away from a victim count on the scale of Hitler’s Holocaust.”
(also, see her bulleted list of factors for some explanations - too many to list here)
In this article, the author calls on Western women to unite and fight this human rights abuse.
Were you aware of the severity of the problem? What do you think people can do to help solve it?
Do you think international pressure or shame or something else would work?
2007-11-14
13:12:45
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Social Science
➔ Gender Studies
as the article points out, it's men's violence against women. women cause little violence to other women. of course, in some cases, women help perpetuate it due to culture & tradition.
both men & women have to work towards solving this problem - fortunately, many men have been helping, so nobody's calling men villians, we're saying this is a problem & society needs to solve it.
2007-11-14
13:40:34 ·
update #1
Violence agst women is the #1 killer of women 14-44. Disease, accidents & suicide is #1 killer of men in the same age range.
While I'm against violence in general, I am deeply concerned about women.
Again, not an us-vs-them thing. I have worked side-by-side with men on this issue. You don't want to help - that says alot about you. As for me, it's a priority in my life & I appreciate all the men working to help solve this issue. I certainly think women have always helped men injured by violence- nursing them back to health & so forth.
2007-11-15
12:03:00 ·
update #2
the "women are perps of violence to men" argument - sure, like I said, i am against all violence. what amazes me is that there is more male-to-male violence yet you focus on women-on-men. why is that?
also, we all know men are victims of violence- see it in the news everyday. most research & surveys on violence focus on men. not much is done re: women. we only just got laws (dv & rape & mass rape as a war crime) in the 70s- not very long, is it?
my interest lies in women. if it were children, the elderly, animals, i wouldn't be attacked, would i? but somehow, i have a concern about violence agst women - a monumental issue- and i'm attacked for not thinking about men. do you attack those in child abuse for not caring about adults? those for the elderly for not caring about the young?
it's a very curious thing, you're empathy is only given if men are involved.
2007-11-15
12:09:44 ·
update #3