if Siskel and Ebert and now Roeper grew up on a farm instead of a city and each was in a silo bin or tractor accident which cut off 8 of thier fingers and all three of them were only left with their 2 middle fingers, would they have still been good movie critics?
2007-11-14 12:52:27 · 7 answers · asked by xfileaddict1969 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
People actually listen to those bozos?
2007-11-14 13:01:23 · answer #1 · answered by infidel-louie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dislike roeper as well, and hope that ebert recovers from his sickness and gets again to film reviewing! Even though siskel and ebert differed on opinions, fairly most commonly, i leave out siskel. They were a good staff.
2016-08-06 07:12:03 · answer #2 · answered by tosto 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unlike the ridiculous answers by everyone else, yes they would have been fine as movie critics. You don't need thumbs or fingers to review movies, just a voice.
2007-11-14 13:03:46 · answer #3 · answered by goten60629 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Prosthetic thumbs are the answer to many of life's most vexing questions.
2007-11-14 13:00:13 · answer #4 · answered by Reverend Black Grape 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes...
They are great... and they wouldn't need a voice...
just a mind... and eyes...don't you agree?
2007-11-15 02:25:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-11-14 12:58:28 · answer #6 · answered by JeffG 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-11-14 12:57:23 · answer #7 · answered by Liz S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋