Is a fair trial possible, or do you think he will be convicted because of previous alleged crimes of murder?
2007-11-14 11:59:22 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Personally, I think karma is awesome. I'll leave it at that. LOL
2007-11-14 15:44:28 · update #1
There is a big difference between being found not guilty in a court of law and actually being innocent.
Perhaps if OJ had spent the last umpteen years searching for the "real" killer, as he said he would, it would be easier to feel compassion towards him now.
2007-11-16 12:18:04 · update #2
Well, he obviously proves the point in the Vegas case that he's a hothead that reacts poorly under pressure -- this kind of proves he did murder his wife and Goldman.
2007-11-16 15:39:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
His comment was something to the effect.."I will turn to the jury as I did before..."
The Bill of Rights affords one the benefit of never having to stand trial twice for a crime of which one has been acquitted.
Public sentiment on the other hand, has been known to sometimes blind people to this concept...Historically, many defendants in the same position as OJ Simpson have ended up with a conviction.
Judging from the media polls and all that has been voiced over the last 13 yrs, I do think many people's minds are already made...I think it would be difficult to find an unbiased jury...many have been waiting for this day to come...a day where he would "Pay".
My gut feeling: 1994...he was responsible for the deaths...despite being found Not Guilty.
My gut feeling: 2007...he foolishly, thoughtlessly and recklessly stumbled into a very incriminating situation that was a long time coming (a long time in the making?).
http://www.ojsimpsoninjail.com
.
2007-11-15 23:29:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It'll be hard to get a fair trial, the defense will try to weed out as many bias jurors as possible but likely some will already have the guilty vote in their minds before the first evidence is presented. This trial should be tried on it's own merits and not collaterally from the first one.
2007-11-14 12:24:26 · answer #3 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think the previous asserting what comes around.....rings actual for this reason. His dream group will ought to accomplish yet another miracle. If I have been a family contributors memer of Ron Goldman or Nicole Brown-Simpson i might think of thank freeking God, that is approximately time.
2016-10-16 13:32:10 · answer #4 · answered by goldthorpe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my humble opinion OJ bought his acquittal in his previous criminal trial with his high priced legal representation and his name recognition. The average person with the average income would have been fried in that situation regardless. Provided the prosecution doesn't screw up he'll finally get his comeuppance.
2007-11-14 12:38:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
He will be convicted and go to the slammer for 6 yrs and not before time.
2007-11-14 12:43:39 · answer #6 · answered by realdolby 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it's a sick twisted circus yet again and the media is all over it.
You can't demand stuff back that you auctioned off for money in the first place.
2007-11-14 12:16:00 · answer #7 · answered by Seedna 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This time he cannot say the glove did not fit, but I guess he will come up with another stupid excuse.
2007-11-14 12:12:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
he'll get a fair trial, al sharpton will be his character witness.
2007-11-14 12:20:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
We don't know the evidence yet.
2007-11-14 13:02:19 · answer #10 · answered by Renaissance Man 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋