i was just answering questions, you know, like you do. and i saw someone right hitler was a liberal. i have to get you opionion on this? sorry dude for blasting your answer like this but that's a good question to ask? i think. what ever. hate me if you want to. i can handle it.
2007-11-14 07:53:55 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't think the same parameters were in effect back then. I don't think he was either, I think he was just a meglamaniac, & saw the world as his. The soothsayers said so, right before he put them to death & said he had visions that he was the man to purify the world. Wait, didn't Bush have visions of talking to God...oh dear, what shall we do now????
2007-11-14 07:59:46 · answer #1 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
First, you're actually not exact defining liberal and conservative. 2nd, liberal and conservative have diverse meanings politically at diverse sessions of time. as an occasion, a conservative interior the Sixties (enable's use Barry Goldwater) is thoroughly diverse than a conservative now or perhaps interior the Nineteen Eighties. Goldwater exchange into against government involvement in faith, abortion, and another minor issues that could now be seen liberal motives. to respond to your question certainly, Hitler exchange right into a conservative in early Nineteen Thirties Germany. The leftist Weimar Republik government that preceded him have been seen the liberals of the time. Hitler went after the Germans that defied social democracy and communism. everyday, in a very difficulty-loose style, you ought to call HItler a fascist. Fascism is a variety of government that exchange into created as a reaction to communism. The featured tenets contain the enslavement of an undesirable sect of society to accomplish miniscule activity for the final public of society. For him, it exchange into communists, jews, homosexuals, gypsies, and all of us else who have been seen undesirables.
2016-10-16 12:52:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was very convincing and appealed to the needs of his country; at the time, he did not need a party, he had the gift of gab and was able to convince persons a particular path in life was the best direction ( only ) for his country--and this lead alot of persons into a fascist state, where individuals, their beliefs became null and void under an emergency state--a requirement for family life, a way to support their family, and the government offered that guidance.
It morphed at one point; from one state of government into fascism.
This is why it is imperative; that all voices are heard.
The right to free speech wards away any form of fascism, or communism, or abuses by government.
2007-11-14 08:05:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fascism is considered extreme far right, and Communism is considered extreme far left.
In that right, Hitler would would be more akin the the "conservative" end of the spectrum and Stalin more akin to the "liberal" end.... but really.. how far do you have to go before you can't claim it to be the same thing anymore?
2007-11-14 08:01:52 · answer #4 · answered by pip 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was a Dictatorial Fascist who hated anything Left, especially Communists. He was the best example of what Eisenhower branded "The Military Industrial Complex".
2007-11-14 08:02:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He told people what they wanted to hear at the time. He tolerated the old traditions because he could use them to rally the people, he tolerated the church as long is it helped him to solidify his control over the people. In truth there was room for only one religion in his new Germany, and he was to its high priest. He instituted sweeping changes in Germany, which could hardly be seen as the actions of a conservative.
2007-11-14 08:38:43 · answer #6 · answered by Mike W 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is Hitler reincarnate, Either that or Bush is a Hitler Wanna B,,
2007-11-14 08:02:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hitler and his party were fascists; on the extreme right side of the political spectrum.
Thus, Hitler was a Con.
2007-11-14 07:58:36 · answer #8 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
they probably thought that the Nationalist Socialist German Workers party was socialist because it said socialist but infact they were extreme right wing...fascism by definition is Social sacrifice for the state...that's how it can be confused.
2007-11-14 07:57:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
He was conservative but not your garden variety. Fascism falls very far right on the old political spectrum. I'm talking past "tom delay" territory.
2007-11-14 07:57:07 · answer #10 · answered by Franklin 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋