Muriel wonders the same thing, since she was one of many students in the audience with their hands raised. Don't believe the "It's news to me" spin for a minute.
2007-11-14 07:07:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Hillary doesn't go to the bathroom without focus groups telling her how to sit. She would not be capable of a free, open question and answer session. All she knows is the canned answers to the canned questions.
2007-11-14 07:25:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rick K 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
there's a skinny line between asking an honest question and throwing a delicate "replace-up" on your candidate to "hit out of the park". that's like a at present guy in a comedy habitual, performing like it fairly is a severe question, yet understanding that's is in basic terms a series up for the humorous better half to furnish out the "Punch line". Hillary is unlike Tanya Harding. that may not a honest remark! That replaced into no longer genuine. Tanya's movements have been criminal!!! yet I admit i do no longer remember Hillary even having an opinion on the subject of the numerous political affairs, no longer to show show any management skills as 1st woman. Then sooner or later she by surprise desperate to run for president, on the coat tails of her regularly occurring yet untrue "better half" invoice, who left semen on the gown of "that female", and tried to lie approximately it, to the court docket, and the country, whilst Hillary rooted for a shown liar. in case you pay attention heavily, applicants fairly do no longer answer interviewers' questions many times any way. they are going to easily use the question, to launch right into a "speech" that they'd desire to make, approximately what they planned to speak approximately besides! If a shill (that's what they are referred to as in coach corporation) would not ask a series "up question", she'd overlook on the subject of the genuine question, and supply out the set answer any way. So no longer plenty fairly replaced.
2016-12-16 08:37:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by vallee 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The same way that mentalists can do the same thing, one of her staff knew who had which question and they fed the person to Hillary through her earpiece.
2007-11-14 07:08:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hey RR, you know there were only a few hundred people there. So the odds of her picked one were like one in two hundred, the odds of her picking two were...... Oh I see your point. Too bad people's noses don't grow when they tell a story. think of all the long noses. take care.
2007-11-14 07:45:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by R J 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually the video shows that an aide pointed the student out to Hillary and suggested that she call on that person. Doesn't prove things one way or the other, but does answer your question.
2007-11-14 07:07:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by buffytou 6
·
1⤊
5⤋
The Mock Senator from New York says: "It depends on what your definition of "if" is...(thanks Bill, I knew I married you for a reason!).
2007-11-15 03:03:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bam Bam Obama 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Careful - she SAID she had no idea.... or her aide SAID she had no idea.... There's nothing there about HAVING no idea.
There's a BIG difference. Remember, you're dealing with politicians.
2007-11-14 07:44:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Divining rod.
2007-11-15 07:09:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everyone knows Hillary is fake, she'll be off our TV's soon, don't worry...
2007-11-14 07:07:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by ryan c 5
·
6⤊
1⤋