As near as I can tell neither greasable, greasible, greaseable, or greaseible is a word. I think you will have to "such and such can be greased."
2007-11-14 07:12:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by ghouly05 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually I would probably hyphenate it as grease-able. Other wise, I think greaseable works. I like it better than grease able which might have a different meaning.
2007-11-14 07:05:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Al W 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are both correct. Two different meanings. Greaseable indicates something that can be greased. Grease able shows something that can tolerate grease. If you use grease-able you might hyphonate the words.
2007-11-14 07:10:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by yuvid6 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are talking about a piece of machinery, you could say, for example, that the power drive of a computer is not greasable. I'm assuming geaseable was a double typo....
When you combine words you don't always have to retain the 'e' on the end of the first word. Eg, driveable isn't correct if you are talking about a vehicle that is capable of being driven, instead, you use drivable
2007-11-14 07:07:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by old lady 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
geaseable....grease able....what is this word you speak of?
2007-11-14 07:06:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by nerak 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
u sed geasable lol
bt greaseable sounds fine
y do u care so much????
2007-11-14 07:06:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
what ticks on walls
its ticky paper
2007-11-14 07:06:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by joseph b 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no space - greaseable
2007-11-14 07:04:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by sandwest 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
haha
2007-11-14 07:06:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by lorenchen88 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
grvd
2007-11-14 07:05:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋